Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tsie Giorgio's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tsie Giorgio's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tsie Giorgio's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tsie Giorgio's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:08 | 41:50 to 38:42 | 59.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:59 | 06:18 to 05:19 | 18.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 05:08 to 04:20 | 15.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:25 to 04:14 | 3.5% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:44 to 04:34 | 3.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:23 to 02:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Tsie Giorgio | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:12 | 00:00 | 04:20 -01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 03:12 | 04:20 +00:05 | 04:20 -01:08 |
| Running 2 | 04:44 | 07:37 | 04:41 +00:03 | 08:40 -01:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 12:21 | 02:41 -00:18 | 13:21 -01:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 14:44 | 05:05 +00:00 | 16:02 -01:18 |
| Sled Pull | 03:55 | 19:49 | 04:30 -00:35 | 21:07 -01:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:17 | 23:44 | 05:04 +00:13 | 25:37 -01:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:08 | 29:01 | 04:46 +00:22 | 30:41 -01:40 |
| Running 5 | 07:18 | 34:09 | 05:12 +02:06 | 35:27 -01:18 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 41:27 | 04:40 +00:04 | 40:39 +00:48 |
| Running 6 | 05:16 | 46:11 | 05:04 +00:12 | 45:19 +00:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 51:27 | 02:01 -00:23 | 50:23 +01:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 53:05 | 05:03 +00:13 | 52:24 +00:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:12 | 58:21 | 04:38 -00:26 | 57:27 +00:54 |
| Running 8 | 05:46 | 01:02:33 | 05:32 +00:14 | 01:02:05 +00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 06:18 | 01:08:19 | 05:51 +00:27 | 01:07:37 +00:42 |
| Roxzone | 05:01 | 01:19:30 | 06:02 -01:01 | 01:19:30 |
Giorgio Tsie delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event. He ranked 677th overall and 13th in his age group, placing him in the top 21% and top 11% respectively. His overall time of 01:19:30 reflects a balanced approach to both running and strength segments. However, his total running time was 1:28 slower than the average, indicating room for improvement in running efficiency. Giorgio's pacing analysis suggests he started the race with a strong running performance but gradually slowed down, particularly noticeable in the Running 5 segment. This indicates he might have expended too much energy early on. Overall, Giorgio exhibits a hybrid profile with a slight inclination towards strength exercises but needs to enhance his running endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| PLoeg Jacco | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:19:38 | |
| Cornely David | 2022 Essen | 01:19:58 | |
| Wolski Jakub | 2024 Gdansk | 01:19:33 | |
| Damkot Jesper | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:19:16 | |
| Palmero Buendía Eusebio | 2021 Madrid | 01:19:19 | |
| Piliounis George | 2022 London | 01:19:11 | |
| Lindeberg Max | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:19:52 | |
| Dowson Robbie | 2024 London | 01:19:04 | |
| Kharin Dmitry | 2023 Dublin | 01:19:29 | |
| Schilder Vince | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:19:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
