Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 711 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Smith Natalie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Smith Natalie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Smith Natalie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Smith Natalie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:42 | 10:15 to 07:33 | 56.1% |
| Rowing | 00:44 | 06:26 to 05:42 | 15.2% |
| Run Total | 00:44 | 52:31 to 51:47 | 15.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:30 | 06:38 to 06:08 | 10.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:09 | 05:51 to 05:42 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:35 to 02:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:29 to 05:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Smith Natalie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:17 | 00:00 | 05:43 +00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:23 | 06:17 | 05:23 +00:00 | 05:43 +00:34 |
| Running 2 | 06:13 | 11:40 | 06:13 +00:00 | 11:06 +00:34 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 17:53 | 03:09 -00:34 | 17:19 +00:34 |
| Running 3 | 06:38 | 20:28 | 06:37 +00:01 | 20:28 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 05:29 | 27:06 | 06:44 -01:15 | 27:05 +00:01 |
| Running 4 | 06:27 | 32:35 | 06:38 -00:11 | 33:49 -01:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:15 | 39:02 | 07:47 +02:28 | 40:27 -01:25 |
| Running 5 | 06:29 | 49:17 | 06:53 -00:24 | 48:14 +01:03 |
| Rowing | 06:26 | 55:46 | 05:44 +00:42 | 55:07 +00:39 |
| Running 6 | 06:50 | 01:02:12 | 06:46 +00:04 | 01:00:51 +01:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:20 | 01:09:02 | 02:33 -00:13 | 01:07:37 +01:25 |
| Running 7 | 06:27 | 01:11:22 | 06:42 -00:15 | 01:10:10 +01:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:51 | 01:17:49 | 05:49 +00:02 | 01:16:52 +00:57 |
| Running 8 | 07:14 | 01:23:40 | 07:26 -00:12 | 01:22:41 +00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 06:38 | 01:30:54 | 06:19 +00:19 | 01:30:07 +00:47 |
| Roxzone | 07:45 | 01:45:09 | 08:43 -00:58 | 01:45:09 |
Natalie's total running time of 00:52:31 was 00:36 slower than the average, indicating that she could benefit from improving her running fitness. Her best running lap of 00:06:13 was a strong performance, showcasing her potential as a runner. However, her performance in some running segments, such as Running 1 (00:06:17), Running 2 (00:06:13), and Running 3 (00:06:38), was slower than the average. This suggests that Natalie should focus on improving her running endurance and speed.
By focusing on these areas of improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Natalie Smith can enhance her performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rubio Berenice | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:45:37 | |
| Halle Olga | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:44:55 | |
| Brooks Susan | 2023 Birmingham | 01:44:48 | |
| Choi Karen | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:45:32 | |
| Fetic Melissa | 2019 Leipzig | 01:45:06 | |
| Shea Stephanie | 2021 Birmingham | 01:44:47 | |
| Stephan Hanna | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:45:31 | |
| Moore Christy | 2022 Dallas | 01:45:28 | |
| Zengerink Floor | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:44:40 | |
| Spencer Emaya | 2024 Birmingham | 01:45:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
