Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Radley Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Radley Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Radley Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Radley Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:29 | 47:46 to 44:17 | 60.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:23 | 08:08 to 06:45 | 23.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 | 02:38 to 02:13 | 7.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 05:37 to 05:19 | 5.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 05:49 to 05:37 | 3.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:52 to 02:52 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Radley Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:59 | 00:00 | 04:47 +00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 04:59 | 04:33 -00:22 | 04:47 +00:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:34 | 09:10 | 05:14 +00:20 | 09:20 -00:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 14:44 | 03:07 -00:15 | 14:34 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 05:49 | 17:36 | 05:43 +00:06 | 17:41 -00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 04:40 | 23:25 | 05:20 -00:40 | 23:24 +00:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:59 | 28:05 | 05:41 +00:18 | 28:44 -00:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:49 | 34:04 | 05:54 -00:05 | 34:25 -00:21 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 39:53 | 05:53 +00:12 | 40:19 -00:26 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 45:58 | 04:57 -00:28 | 46:12 -00:14 |
| Running 6 | 06:25 | 50:27 | 05:43 +00:42 | 51:09 -00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:38 | 56:52 | 02:20 +00:18 | 56:52 +00:00 |
| Running 7 | 06:09 | 59:30 | 05:42 +00:27 | 59:12 +00:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:37 | 01:05:39 | 05:33 +00:04 | 01:04:54 +00:45 |
| Running 8 | 06:50 | 01:11:16 | 06:27 +00:23 | 01:10:27 +00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 08:08 | 01:18:06 | 07:10 +00:58 | 01:16:54 +01:12 |
| Roxzone | 05:34 | 01:31:40 | 07:36 -02:02 | 01:31:40 |
Pacing Analysis:
Mark's pacing throughout the race was fairly consistent, with only minor deviations from the average splits. However, it is worth noting that his total running time was 03:57 slower than the average, indicating that he may need to focus on improving his running fitness and speed.
Profile Analysis:
Based on the analysis of Mark's total running time, it appears that he has a stronger profile in terms of strength rather than running. To further enhance his performance, he should prioritize training his running abilities and improving his overall fitness level.
In conclusion, Mark Radley had a solid performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race. To enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his running fitness, particularly in the segments where he lost the most time. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and form corrections, Mark can improve his performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Carroll Stephen | 2024 Dublin | 01:31:59 | |
| Cano Gimenez Francisco | 2023 Valencia | 01:31:28 | |
| Franzen Christian | 2023 Hamburg | 01:31:41 | |
| Callan Andrew | 2024 London | 01:31:34 | |
| Hillebrand Raymon | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:31:52 | |
| Noll Daniel | 2019 Wien | 01:31:40 | |
| Roberys Michael | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:13 | |
| Jeffery Jason | 2024 London | 01:31:13 | |
| De Groot Benjamin | 2018 Essen | 01:31:22 | |
| Mandas Thomas | 2024 Glasgow | 01:31:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:32:52 | |
| 2023 London | 01:33:21 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
