Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Petersen Thomas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Petersen Thomas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Petersen Thomas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Petersen Thomas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:21 | 51:39 to 46:18 | 91.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:25 | 06:08 to 05:43 | 7.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:06 | 05:34 to 05:28 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:33 to 05:33 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:11 to 06:11 | 0.0% |
| Petersen Thomas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:35 | 00:00 | 04:59 +00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:55 | 05:35 | 04:37 -00:42 | 04:59 +00:36 |
| Running 2 | 07:37 | 09:30 | 05:25 +02:12 | 09:36 -00:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 17:07 | 03:15 -01:02 | 15:01 +02:06 |
| Running 3 | 06:09 | 19:20 | 05:59 +00:10 | 18:16 +01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 25:29 | 05:39 -00:05 | 24:15 +01:14 |
| Running 4 | 06:18 | 31:03 | 05:56 +00:22 | 29:54 +01:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:33 | 37:21 | 06:20 -00:47 | 35:50 +01:31 |
| Running 5 | 06:34 | 42:54 | 06:10 +00:24 | 42:10 +00:44 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 49:28 | 05:03 -00:29 | 48:20 +01:08 |
| Running 6 | 06:06 | 54:02 | 05:59 +00:07 | 53:23 +00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 01:00:08 | 02:26 -00:24 | 59:22 +00:46 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 01:02:10 | 05:57 -00:20 | 01:01:48 +00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:08 | 01:07:47 | 05:54 +00:14 | 01:07:45 +00:02 |
| Running 8 | 07:47 | 01:13:55 | 06:51 +00:56 | 01:13:39 +00:16 |
| Wall Balls | 06:11 | 01:21:42 | 07:41 -01:30 | 01:20:30 +01:12 |
| Roxzone | 08:42 | 01:36:26 | 08:15 +00:27 | 01:36:26 |
Thomas Petersen's performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox race showcased a mix of strengths and areas for growth. With an overall rank of 889, he placed in the top 64% of all participants and in the top 56% in his age group. His total running time was 3:56 slower than the average, indicating room for improvement in running. His best running lap was 00:05:37, which was faster than average, suggesting potential for better pacing throughout the race. Thomas displayed a strong proficiency in strength-related segments, such as the Ski Erg and Sled Push, where he performed significantly faster than average. This highlights a strength-oriented profile, suggesting a need to enhance his running capabilities to achieve a more balanced performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Last Mathias | 2024 Malaga | 01:36:19 | |
| Deiser Rene | 2023 Dublin | 01:36:55 | |
| Dean Matthew | 2022 London | 01:36:17 | |
| Haude Vincent | 2019 Essen | 01:36:27 | |
| Arnott Ryan | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:35:57 | |
| Williams Andy | 2024 Glasgow | 01:36:12 | |
| Hannah David | 2020 Chicago | 01:36:24 | |
| Malinowski Rafał | 2024 Katowice | 01:36:04 | |
| Ercklentz Martin | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:36:24 | |
| Wyatt Aaron | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:36:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Malaga | 01:55:06 | |
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:55:06 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
