Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Essen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 764 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:44 (From 52:43 to 50:59) | 54.2% |
| BBJ | 00:53 (From 08:15 to 07:22) | 27.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:23 (From 02:52 to 02:29) | 12.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 (From 05:28 to 05:21) | 3.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 (From 03:11 to 03:06) | 2.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 06:09 to 06:09) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 05:14 to 05:14) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:55 to 04:55) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 05:18 to 05:18) | 0.0% |
| Pekal Iryna | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:57 | 00:00 | 05:37 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:28 | 05:57 | 05:22 +00:06 | 05:37 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 06:20 | 11:25 | 06:08 +00:12 | 10:59 +00:26 |
| Sled Push | 03:11 | 17:45 | 03:07 +00:04 | 17:07 +00:38 |
| Running 3 | 06:25 | 20:56 | 06:29 -00:04 | 20:14 +00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 06:09 | 27:21 | 06:46 -00:37 | 26:43 +00:38 |
| Running 4 | 06:17 | 33:30 | 06:32 -00:15 | 33:29 +00:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:15 | 39:47 | 07:34 +00:41 | 40:01 -00:14 |
| Running 5 | 06:20 | 48:02 | 06:44 -00:24 | 47:35 +00:27 |
| Rowing | 05:14 | 54:22 | 05:42 -00:28 | 54:19 +00:03 |
| Running 6 | 06:34 | 59:36 | 06:35 -00:01 | 01:00:01 -00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:52 | 01:06:10 | 02:31 +00:21 | 01:06:36 -00:26 |
| Running 7 | 06:27 | 01:09:02 | 06:36 -00:09 | 01:09:07 -00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:55 | 01:15:29 | 05:41 -00:46 | 01:15:43 -00:14 |
| Running 8 | 08:27 | 01:20:24 | 07:15 +01:12 | 01:21:24 -01:00 |
| Wall Balls | 05:18 | 01:28:51 | 06:12 -00:54 | 01:28:39 +00:12 |
| Roxzone | 09:19 | 01:43:20 | 08:29 +00:50 | 01:43:20 |
Pacing and Profile:
Looking at the splits, Iryna's total running time of 00:52:43 was 02:11 slower than the average. This indicates that she may need to focus on improving her overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, her best running lap time of 00:05:57 was 00:36 slower than average, suggesting that she may benefit from more specific running training.
Additionally, Iryna should practice transitions between exercises to minimize rest time and improve overall efficiency. Incorporating specific drills and timing herself during training can help her improve her transition speed and minimize time lost.
Overall, Iryna has shown great potential in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where she can make improvements. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, she can enhance her performance in the identified areas and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Willsmer Carla | 2022 London | 01:43:05 | |
| Bärnthaler Sylvia | 2023 Wien | 01:43:23 | |
| Facey Tara | 2024 London | 01:43:37 | |
| Woods Chloe | 2024 Dallas | 01:43:12 | |
| Kopp Nadine | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:43:04 | |
| Salzgeber Michaela | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:43:15 | |
| Mohamad Ahsik Hera Iman | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:43:44 | |
| Horsmans Kelly | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:43:36 | |
| Wanatowicz Kathy | 2022 Chicago | 01:43:35 | |
| Krefft Jigeesha | 2019 Hamburg | 01:42:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Essen Pekal Iryna | 02:04:06 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Pekal Iryna
