Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Martin Meg's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Martin Meg's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Martin Meg's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Martin Meg's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:16 | 06:39 to 04:23 | 41.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:30 | 06:00 to 04:30 | 27.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:02 | 06:41 to 05:39 | 18.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:19 | 02:50 to 02:31 | 5.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 05:13 to 05:00 | 3.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:17 to 02:06 | 3.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:51 to 42:51 | 0.0% |
| Martin Meg | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:54 | 00:00 | 05:09 -01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:13 | 03:54 | 05:06 +00:07 | 05:09 -01:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:15 | 09:07 | 05:25 -00:10 | 10:15 -01:08 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 14:22 | 02:43 +00:07 | 15:40 -01:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:28 | 17:12 | 05:44 -00:16 | 18:23 -01:11 |
| Sled Pull | 04:45 | 22:40 | 05:41 -00:56 | 24:07 -01:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 27:25 | 05:45 -00:26 | 29:48 -02:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:41 | 32:44 | 05:58 +00:43 | 35:33 -02:49 |
| Running 5 | 05:47 | 39:25 | 05:53 -00:06 | 41:31 -02:06 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 45:12 | 05:21 -00:18 | 47:24 -02:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 50:15 | 05:47 -00:04 | 52:45 -02:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 55:58 | 02:15 +00:02 | 58:32 -02:34 |
| Running 7 | 05:26 | 58:15 | 05:45 -00:19 | 01:00:47 -02:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:00 | 01:03:41 | 04:42 +01:18 | 01:06:32 -02:51 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:09:41 | 06:07 -00:04 | 01:11:14 -01:33 |
| Wall Balls | 06:39 | 01:15:44 | 04:52 +01:47 | 01:17:21 -01:37 |
| Roxzone | 06:41 | 01:28:57 | 06:44 -00:03 | 01:28:57 |
Meg Martin, a participant in the 45-49 age group, showcased an impressive performance in the recent 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event. With a finish time of 01:28:57, she ranked 222nd overall, placing her in the top 15% of the 1404 athletes who took part. Notably, she excelled in her age group, ranking 22nd among 141 athletes.
Her strength clearly lies in running, as demonstrated by her total running time of 00:42:51, which is 03:00 faster than the average. This indicates a strong runner's profile. Her best running lap was recorded at 00:05:15.
Her start to the race was faster than average, with her first four running segments consistently outpacing the average times. This suggests a well-executed pacing strategy and good energy management throughout the race.
While Meg Martin displayed a strong running prowess, there were several areas where she fell behind the average pace. These segments have the most potential for improvement:
For future races, Meg should continue with her current pacing strategy for running segments as it's proving effective. However, she could benefit from implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Temmermans Rianne | 2024 Köln | 01:29:21 | |
| Dorby Kirsty | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:29:20 | |
| Fallbrock Carmen | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:29:00 | |
| Beckert Melanie | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:29:13 | |
| Martin Rachael | 2024 Dublin | 01:28:28 | |
| SpencerRogers Micaela | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:28:55 | |
| Fontenette Leslee | 2023 Dallas | 01:29:12 | |
| Hartge Elizabeth | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:28:57 | |
| Salisbury Ingrid | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:29:00 | |
| Shepherd Eleanor | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
