Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Latorre Matt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Latorre Matt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Latorre Matt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Latorre Matt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:29 | 06:04 to 04:35 | 33.2% |
| Run Total | 01:26 | 42:45 to 41:19 | 32.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:03 | 05:49 to 04:46 | 23.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:14 to 02:01 | 4.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 02:49 to 02:40 | 3.4% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:51 to 04:43 | 3.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:40 to 05:40 | 0.0% |
| Latorre Matt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:37 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 04:37 | 04:25 -00:05 | 04:35 +00:02 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 08:57 | 04:55 +00:18 | 09:00 -00:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:49 | 14:10 | 02:51 -00:02 | 13:55 +00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 16:59 | 05:21 +00:04 | 16:46 +00:13 |
| Sled Pull | 06:04 | 22:24 | 04:51 +01:13 | 22:07 +00:17 |
| Running 4 | 05:30 | 28:28 | 05:20 +00:10 | 26:58 +01:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:40 | 33:58 | 05:14 -00:34 | 32:18 +01:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 38:38 | 05:30 -00:02 | 37:32 +01:06 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 44:06 | 04:47 +00:04 | 43:02 +01:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:23 | 48:57 | 05:21 +00:02 | 47:49 +01:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 54:20 | 02:09 +00:05 | 53:10 +01:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 56:34 | 05:20 +00:07 | 55:19 +01:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:49 | 01:02:01 | 05:02 +00:47 | 01:00:39 +01:22 |
| Running 8 | 05:47 | 01:07:50 | 05:56 -00:09 | 01:05:41 +02:09 |
| Wall Balls | 05:40 | 01:13:37 | 06:24 -00:44 | 01:11:37 +02:00 |
| Roxzone | 05:36 | 01:24:44 | 06:43 -01:07 | 01:24:44 |
It is worth noting that Matt's best running lap was 00:04:37, indicating that he has the potential to perform at a higher level in running segments.
In conclusion, Matt Latorre performed well in the Hyrox race in Birmingham. To further improve his performance, he should focus on improving his running endurance and speed, as well as building strength in his upper body and legs for strength-based segments. By implementing specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and form corrections, Matt can enhance his performance in these areas and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Saß Frederic | 2022 Essen | 01:25:07 | |
| Goldstein Daniel | 2024 Dubai | 01:24:17 | |
| Galloway Euan | 2023 Manchester | 01:24:14 | |
| Geuer Lukas | 2024 Köln | 01:24:57 | |
| Koch Steffen | 2023 München | 01:25:12 | |
| Martinez Rubio Miguel Ángel | 2022 Valencia | 01:24:22 | |
| Scholten Marco | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:27 | |
| Sirrs Richard | 2024 Maastricht | 01:24:28 | |
| Willeboordse Dennis | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:24:51 | |
| Tebbutt Crispin | 2023 London | 01:24:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:20:49 | |
| 2022 London | 01:21:24 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
