Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 772 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hemming Adam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hemming Adam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hemming Adam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hemming Adam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:13 | 57:50 to 51:37 | 76.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:44 | 03:31 to 02:47 | 9.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:25 | 07:47 to 07:22 | 5.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 | 04:12 to 03:48 | 4.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:13 | 07:00 to 06:47 | 2.7% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 05:26 to 05:19 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:33 to 08:33 | 0.0% |
| Hemming Adam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:55 | 00:00 | 05:24 -01:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 03:55 | 04:47 +00:01 | 05:24 -01:29 |
| Running 2 | 06:30 | 08:43 | 06:00 +00:30 | 10:11 -01:28 |
| Sled Push | 04:12 | 15:13 | 03:42 +00:30 | 16:11 -00:58 |
| Running 3 | 07:08 | 19:25 | 06:41 +00:27 | 19:53 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 04:38 | 26:33 | 06:33 -01:55 | 26:34 -00:01 |
| Running 4 | 07:40 | 31:11 | 06:40 +01:00 | 33:07 -01:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:47 | 38:51 | 07:37 +00:10 | 39:47 -00:56 |
| Running 5 | 07:38 | 46:38 | 06:58 +00:40 | 47:24 -00:46 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 54:16 | 05:21 +00:05 | 54:22 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 07:44 | 59:42 | 06:43 +01:01 | 59:43 -00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:31 | 01:07:26 | 02:46 +00:45 | 01:06:26 +01:00 |
| Running 7 | 08:48 | 01:10:57 | 06:48 +02:00 | 01:09:12 +01:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:00 | 01:19:45 | 07:02 -00:02 | 01:16:00 +03:45 |
| Running 8 | 08:31 | 01:26:45 | 08:16 +00:15 | 01:23:02 +03:43 |
| Wall Balls | 08:33 | 01:35:16 | 09:12 -00:39 | 01:31:18 +03:58 |
| Roxzone | 06:52 | 01:50:33 | 10:03 -03:11 | 01:50:33 |
Pacing and Profile:
When looking at Adam's splits, it is evident that his pacing was fairly consistent throughout the race. However, he did lose time in several running segments, specifically Running 7, Running 4, Running 6, and Running 5. This suggests that he may need to focus more on his running training to improve his overall performance. Additionally, his Total running time of 00:57:50 was 06:19 slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from increasing his overall fitness and reducing transition times in the roxzone.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific training techniques, Adam Hemming can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Severino Alessandro | 2023 Milan | 01:50:38 | |
| Marcelle Nick | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:50:50 | |
| Flynn Jez | 2024 Malaga | 01:50:19 | |
| Eames Ryan | 2024 Dubai | 01:50:37 | |
| Cyril Adeel | 2024 Dallas | 01:50:45 | |
| Honetana Rawiri | 2024 Melbourne | 01:50:12 | |
| Oliver Marcelo | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:50:10 | |
| Turner Daniel | 2023 London | 01:50:34 | |
| Blohm Daniel | 2019 Hannover | 01:50:20 | |
| Medvesek Andreas | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:50:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:37:58 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:30:31 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
