Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Guest Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Guest Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Guest Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Guest Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:48 | 38:33 to 33:45 | 87.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:21 | 03:37 to 03:16 | 6.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 02:05 to 01:54 | 3.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:08 | 04:25 to 04:17 | 2.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 01:34 to 01:32 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 02:58 to 02:58 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:18 to 03:18 | 0.0% |
| Guest Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:46 | 00:00 | 03:54 -00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:57 | 03:46 | 04:09 -00:12 | 03:54 -00:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 07:43 | 04:09 +00:51 | 08:03 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:05 | 12:43 | 02:24 -00:19 | 12:12 +00:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:00 | 14:48 | 04:26 +00:34 | 14:36 +00:12 |
| Sled Pull | 02:58 | 19:48 | 03:51 -00:53 | 19:02 +00:46 |
| Running 4 | 04:50 | 22:46 | 04:26 +00:24 | 22:53 -00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:37 | 27:36 | 03:50 -00:13 | 27:19 +00:17 |
| Running 5 | 05:00 | 31:13 | 04:32 +00:28 | 31:09 +00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:04 | 36:13 | 04:25 -00:21 | 35:41 +00:32 |
| Running 6 | 04:58 | 40:17 | 04:28 +00:30 | 40:06 +00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:34 | 45:15 | 01:46 -00:12 | 44:34 +00:41 |
| Running 7 | 04:49 | 46:49 | 04:27 +00:22 | 46:20 +00:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:18 | 51:38 | 03:54 -00:36 | 50:47 +00:51 |
| Running 8 | 05:13 | 54:56 | 04:44 +00:29 | 54:41 +00:15 |
| Wall Balls | 04:25 | 01:00:09 | 04:54 -00:29 | 59:25 +00:44 |
| Roxzone | 04:39 | 01:09:05 | 04:46 -00:07 | 01:09:05 |
Jack Guest showcased an impressive overall performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race. Despite participating in a tough category, Jack secured a respectable rank in both the overall race and his age group. His performance was especially remarkable in exercises like the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Sandbag Lunges where he was significantly faster than the average times. However, his running performance, which was slower than the average, warrants attention. Jack started the race with a strong pace, but his speed deteriorated over time. Based on his performance, Jack appears to have a strength-oriented profile, with his running segments needing improvement.
For future races, Jack should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thiel Manuel | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:09:28 | |
| Mcveigh Lachy | 2024 Brisbane | 01:08:54 | |
| Toquero Rufas Yeray | 2023 Barcelona | 01:08:42 | |
| Green Matt | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:09:24 | |
| Harburg William | 2024 Perth | 01:09:22 | |
| Williamson Sean | 2024 Manchester | 01:08:44 | |
| Hackel Christian | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:09:32 | |
| Garcia Alvarez David | 2023 Bilbao | 01:08:41 | |
| Kibble Ryan | 2023 Glasgow | 01:09:09 | |
| Van Osch Bram | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:08:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:23:22 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
