Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 721 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Garland Louise's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Garland Louise's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Garland Louise's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Garland Louise's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 13:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 13:59 | 01:05:15 to 51:16 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:30 to 05:30 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:38 to 03:38 | 0.0% |
| Garland Louise | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 05:39 -00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 05:29 | 05:23 -00:37 | 05:39 -00:10 |
| Running 2 | 08:05 | 10:15 | 06:10 +01:55 | 11:02 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:00 | 18:20 | 03:06 -01:06 | 17:12 +01:08 |
| Running 3 | 08:40 | 20:20 | 06:31 +02:09 | 20:18 +00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:47 | 29:00 | 06:45 -01:58 | 26:49 +02:11 |
| Running 4 | 08:49 | 33:47 | 06:34 +02:15 | 33:34 +00:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:30 | 42:36 | 07:40 -02:10 | 40:08 +02:28 |
| Running 5 | 08:53 | 48:06 | 06:45 +02:08 | 47:48 +00:18 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 56:59 | 05:42 -00:48 | 54:33 +02:26 |
| Running 6 | 09:04 | 01:01:53 | 06:38 +02:26 | 01:00:15 +01:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 01:10:57 | 02:32 -00:26 | 01:06:53 +04:04 |
| Running 7 | 06:29 | 01:13:03 | 06:37 -00:08 | 01:09:25 +03:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:23 | 01:19:32 | 05:46 -01:23 | 01:16:02 +03:30 |
| Running 8 | 09:50 | 01:23:55 | 07:25 +02:25 | 01:21:48 +02:07 |
| Wall Balls | 03:38 | 01:33:45 | 06:08 -02:30 | 01:29:13 +04:32 |
| Roxzone | 06:32 | 01:43:48 | 08:27 -01:55 | 01:43:48 |
Louise Garland delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 527 out of 1801 athletes, placing her in the top 29%. In her age group (35-39), she ranked 95th among 378 competitors, positioning her in the top 25%. Her overall time was 01:43:48. The analysis indicates that Louise shows a strong strength profile, excelling particularly in exercises such as the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Burpees Broad Jump, and Wall Balls. However, her total running time was significantly slower than average, suggesting a need to enhance her running performance. Louise's pacing analysis reveals a tendency to start strong, as seen in Running 1, but her pace drops considerably in subsequent running segments, indicating potential fatigue or inefficient pacing strategy.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Springall Hannah | 2023 Singapore | 01:43:58 | |
| Andrews Karrina | 2024 Glasgow | 01:44:13 | |
| Olguin Jimenez Daniela | 2024 Mexico City | 01:43:56 | |
| De Jong Evelien | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:44:10 | |
| Stubbs Cassandra | 2021 New York | 01:43:34 | |
| Shek Jacqueline | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:43:22 | |
| Brown Samantha | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:43:22 | |
| Kirkby Ashley | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:44:08 | |
| Pentland Kelly Taylor | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:43:34 | |
| Schäfer Elena | 2019 Hamburg | 01:43:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
