Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Freeman Antony's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Freeman Antony's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Freeman Antony's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Freeman Antony's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:03 | 38:45 to 37:42 | 38.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:40 | 04:47 to 04:07 | 24.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 04:28 to 03:58 | 18.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:27 | 02:45 to 02:18 | 16.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 01:53 to 01:47 | 3.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Freeman Antony | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:10 | 00:00 | 04:17 -00:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:51 | 04:10 | 04:19 -00:28 | 04:17 -00:07 |
| Running 2 | 04:34 | 08:01 | 04:34 +00:00 | 08:36 -00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 12:35 | 02:37 +00:08 | 13:10 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 15:20 | 04:57 +00:13 | 15:47 -00:27 |
| Sled Pull | 04:28 | 20:30 | 04:22 +00:06 | 20:44 -00:14 |
| Running 4 | 04:54 | 24:58 | 04:55 -00:01 | 25:06 -00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:47 | 29:52 | 04:34 +00:13 | 30:01 -00:09 |
| Running 5 | 04:54 | 34:39 | 05:03 -00:09 | 34:35 +00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:28 | 39:33 | 04:37 -00:09 | 39:38 -00:05 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 44:01 | 04:57 +00:02 | 44:15 -00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 49:00 | 01:59 -00:06 | 49:12 -00:12 |
| Running 7 | 04:44 | 50:53 | 04:55 -00:11 | 51:11 -00:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:05 | 55:37 | 04:30 -00:25 | 56:06 -00:29 |
| Running 8 | 05:24 | 59:42 | 05:22 +00:02 | 01:00:36 -00:54 |
| Wall Balls | 04:50 | 01:05:06 | 05:41 -00:51 | 01:05:58 -00:52 |
| Roxzone | 07:40 | 01:17:27 | 05:48 +01:52 | 01:17:27 |
Antony's total running time of 00:38:45 was 00:54 slower than the average. This indicates that he may benefit from improving his running performance. It is important to note that his best running lap was 00:04:10, which was only 00:02 slower than the average. This suggests that Antony has the potential to excel in running if he focuses on training and improving his overall fitness.
In conclusion, Antony Freeman had a strong performance in the 2022 London HYROX race, placing in the top percentage of athletes in his age group. To further improve his performance, Antony should focus on improving his running performance, specifically in the Roxzone, Burpees Broad Jump, and Running 3 segments. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and form corrections, Antony can enhance his overall performance in future races. Additionally, implementing race strategies such as proper pacing and efficient transitions can contribute to improved performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Oconnell Jared | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:19 | |
| Heinen Dajo | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:17:27 | |
| Ziehl Marlon | 2023 Barcelona | 01:17:09 | |
| Feu Greg | 2023 London | 01:17:22 | |
| Stroud David | 2021 Dallas | 01:16:58 | |
| Shardlow Ben | 2022 Bremen | 01:16:59 | |
| Bauer Benjamin | 2023 Hamburg | 01:16:57 | |
| Ntatsis Anastasios | 2024 Poznan | 01:17:08 | |
| Hawkins Nathan | 2024 Berlin | 01:17:49 | |
| Morrison Brian | 2023 Chicago | 01:17:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:23:04 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
