Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:14 (From 43:39 to 39:25) | 94.1% |
| Rowing | 00:12 (From 04:48 to 04:36) | 4.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 (From 04:29 to 04:26) | 1.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 (From 04:17 to 04:16) | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:13 to 02:13) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 03:39 to 03:39) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 03:56 to 03:56) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:50 to 01:50) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 05:08 to 05:08) | 0.0% |
| De Boer Lubbert | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:36 | 00:00 | 04:24 +01:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 05:36 | 04:22 -00:05 | 04:24 +01:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 09:53 | 04:44 +00:36 | 08:46 +01:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 15:13 | 02:44 -00:31 | 13:30 +01:43 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 17:26 | 05:08 +00:27 | 16:14 +01:12 |
| Sled Pull | 03:39 | 23:01 | 04:37 -00:58 | 21:22 +01:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 26:40 | 05:06 +00:25 | 25:59 +00:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:56 | 32:11 | 04:56 -01:00 | 31:05 +01:06 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 36:07 | 05:15 +00:26 | 36:01 +00:06 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 41:48 | 04:42 +00:06 | 41:16 +00:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:10 | 46:36 | 05:08 +00:02 | 45:58 +00:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 51:46 | 02:04 -00:14 | 51:06 +00:40 |
| Running 7 | 04:48 | 53:36 | 05:07 -00:19 | 53:10 +00:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:29 | 58:24 | 04:47 -00:18 | 58:17 +00:07 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:02:53 | 05:36 +00:27 | 01:03:04 -00:11 |
| Wall Balls | 05:08 | 01:08:56 | 06:00 -00:52 | 01:08:40 +00:16 |
| Roxzone | 06:58 | 01:20:54 | 06:14 +00:44 | 01:20:54 |
Based on the splits analysis, Lubbert De Boer's performance varied across the different segments. His running 1 time of 00:05:36 was 01:20 slower than the average, indicating some room for improvement in this segment. On the other hand, his ski erg time of 00:04:17 was 00:02 faster than the average, showcasing his strength in this area. Similar variations were observed in the remaining segments, with some being slower or faster than average.
Overall, Lubbert De Boer had a strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas that can be improved to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, he can work towards achieving faster times and better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Najera Kévin | 2023 Paris | 01:21:19 | |
| Spears Daniel | 2023 London | 01:20:41 | |
| Sevasta Jason | 2024 Brisbane | 01:21:21 | |
| Koch Darren | 2023 London | 01:21:22 | |
| Garcia Juan | 2024 New York | 01:20:28 | |
| Mok Wilbur | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:13 | |
| Porter Andrew | 2024 Dublin | 01:20:47 | |
| Lansbergen Wilco | 2024 Paris | 01:20:44 | |
| Berg Christopher | 2024 Hamburg | 01:21:02 | |
| Barclay David | 2024 Brisbane | 01:21:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam De Boer Lubbert | 01:19:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
De Boer Lubbert
