Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 975 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Czeczka Nicole's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Czeczka Nicole's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Czeczka Nicole's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Czeczka Nicole's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:24 | 06:37 to 05:13 | 33.7% |
| Run Total | 01:18 | 49:29 to 48:11 | 31.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:12 | 07:48 to 06:36 | 28.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 05:27 to 05:12 | 6.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:48 to 02:48 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:31 to 05:31 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:29 to 05:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Czeczka Nicole | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:28 | 00:00 | 05:26 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:27 | 04:28 | 05:15 +00:12 | 05:26 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 06:18 | 09:55 | 05:49 +00:29 | 10:41 -00:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 16:13 | 02:57 -00:09 | 16:30 -00:17 |
| Running 3 | 06:31 | 19:01 | 06:07 +00:24 | 19:27 -00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 05:31 | 25:32 | 06:17 -00:46 | 25:34 -00:02 |
| Running 4 | 06:41 | 31:03 | 06:11 +00:30 | 31:51 -00:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:48 | 37:44 | 06:54 +00:54 | 38:02 -00:18 |
| Running 5 | 06:47 | 45:32 | 06:21 +00:26 | 44:56 +00:36 |
| Rowing | 05:29 | 52:19 | 05:32 -00:03 | 51:17 +01:02 |
| Running 6 | 06:11 | 57:48 | 06:14 -00:03 | 56:49 +00:59 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 01:03:59 | 02:25 -00:14 | 01:03:03 +00:56 |
| Running 7 | 05:56 | 01:06:10 | 06:13 -00:17 | 01:05:28 +00:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:16 | 01:12:06 | 05:18 -01:02 | 01:11:41 +00:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:40 | 01:16:22 | 06:46 -00:06 | 01:16:59 -00:37 |
| Wall Balls | 06:37 | 01:23:02 | 05:33 +01:04 | 01:23:45 -00:43 |
| Roxzone | 07:33 | 01:37:03 | 07:45 -00:12 | 01:37:03 |
Nicole Czeczka demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event. Finishing in the top 19% overall and top 18% in her age group is an impressive achievement. Her total running time was 16 seconds faster than average, indicating a strong running capability, which is further supported by her best running lap time of 5:56. This suggests that Nicole has a runner profile and exhibits proficiency in running segments, while maintaining a balanced approach between running and strength-based exercises. However, the initial segments (Running 1 through Running 4) indicate a tendency to start quickly, as Running 1 was significantly faster than average. This could potentially lead to early fatigue, affecting subsequent performance in strength-based segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kaur Kam | 2022 London | 01:37:03 | |
| Jewell Rachel | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:37:03 | |
| Yehl Emma | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:36:35 | |
| Razai Madjabin | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:37:32 | |
| Brady Margaret Anne | 2024 Dallas | 01:37:01 | |
| Pitzer Mareike | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:37:27 | |
| Werffeli Izzy | 2024 London | 01:36:58 | |
| Theis Anna | 2022 München | 01:37:23 | |
| Ruitenbeek Jill | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:37:14 | |
| Mcadam Marie | 2024 Sydney | 01:36:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:32:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
