Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 979 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Yates Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Yates Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Yates Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Yates Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:21 | 54:06 to 49:45 | 73.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:08 | 08:04 to 06:56 | 19.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:17 | 03:52 to 03:35 | 4.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 06:17 to 06:07 | 2.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:13 to 08:13 | 0.0% |
| Yates Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:12 | 00:00 | 05:16 -01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 04:12 | 04:43 -00:02 | 05:16 -01:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:52 | 08:53 | 05:48 +00:04 | 09:59 -01:06 |
| Sled Push | 03:52 | 14:45 | 03:39 +00:13 | 15:47 -01:02 |
| Running 3 | 07:24 | 18:37 | 06:25 +00:59 | 19:26 -00:49 |
| Sled Pull | 06:17 | 26:01 | 06:15 +00:02 | 25:51 +00:10 |
| Running 4 | 07:16 | 32:18 | 06:25 +00:51 | 32:06 +00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:04 | 39:34 | 07:04 +01:00 | 38:31 +01:03 |
| Running 5 | 07:18 | 47:38 | 06:41 +00:37 | 45:35 +02:03 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 54:56 | 05:14 -00:20 | 52:16 +02:40 |
| Running 6 | 07:06 | 59:50 | 06:30 +00:36 | 57:30 +02:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 01:06:56 | 02:37 -00:43 | 01:04:00 +02:56 |
| Running 7 | 07:04 | 01:08:50 | 06:28 +00:36 | 01:06:37 +02:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:22 | 01:15:54 | 06:36 -01:14 | 01:13:05 +02:49 |
| Running 8 | 07:58 | 01:21:16 | 07:44 +00:14 | 01:19:41 +01:35 |
| Wall Balls | 08:13 | 01:29:14 | 08:38 -00:25 | 01:27:25 +01:49 |
| Roxzone | 07:59 | 01:45:18 | 09:15 -01:16 | 01:45:18 |
Mark's total running time of 00:54:06 was 04:45 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his running performance, as indicated by the total running time, was not as strong as desired.
In conclusion, Mark Yates performed well in the HYROX race in Birmingham, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance in future races. By implementing targeted training strategies, focusing on specific weaknesses, and employing smart race strategies, Mark can improve his overall performance and achieve better results in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Weaver Dustin | 2023 Dallas | 01:45:15 | |
| Gil Alejandro | 2024 Madrid | 01:44:58 | |
| Verstraelen Robin | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:44:54 | |
| Nivaggioli Philippe | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:44:55 | |
| Hanrahan Paul | 2024 Dublin | 01:45:34 | |
| Yeo Sean | 2023 Singapore | 01:44:59 | |
| Tibble Kevin | 2022 Birmingham | 01:45:48 | |
| Adler Andre | 2019 Hamburg | 01:45:17 | |
| Ahlers Rich | 2023 New York | 01:44:54 | |
| Johansen Marcus Lund | 2023 Stockholm | 01:44:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
