Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Os Quinten's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Os Quinten's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Os Quinten's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Os Quinten's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:31 | 50:00 to 47:29 | 78.6% |
| Rowing | 00:26 | 05:30 to 05:04 | 13.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:54 to 04:39 | 7.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:15 to 03:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:16 to 06:16 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:54 to 05:54 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:39 to 07:39 | 0.0% |
| Van Os Quinten | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:24 | 00:00 | 05:02 +01:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:54 | 06:24 | 04:39 +00:15 | 05:02 +01:22 |
| Running 2 | 06:10 | 11:18 | 05:34 +00:36 | 09:41 +01:37 |
| Sled Push | 03:15 | 17:28 | 03:24 -00:09 | 15:15 +02:13 |
| Running 3 | 06:32 | 20:43 | 06:06 +00:26 | 18:39 +02:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:24 | 27:15 | 05:50 -00:26 | 24:45 +02:30 |
| Running 4 | 06:11 | 32:39 | 06:04 +00:07 | 30:35 +02:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:16 | 38:50 | 06:36 -00:20 | 36:39 +02:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:56 | 45:06 | 06:20 -00:24 | 43:15 +01:51 |
| Rowing | 05:30 | 51:02 | 05:06 +00:24 | 49:35 +01:27 |
| Running 6 | 05:47 | 56:32 | 06:09 -00:22 | 54:41 +01:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 01:02:19 | 02:31 -00:24 | 01:00:50 +01:29 |
| Running 7 | 05:53 | 01:04:26 | 06:07 -00:14 | 01:03:21 +01:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:54 | 01:10:19 | 06:12 -00:18 | 01:09:28 +00:51 |
| Running 8 | 07:10 | 01:16:13 | 07:07 +00:03 | 01:15:40 +00:33 |
| Wall Balls | 07:39 | 01:23:23 | 07:54 -00:15 | 01:22:47 +00:36 |
| Roxzone | 08:18 | 01:39:13 | 08:32 -00:14 | 01:39:13 |
Quinten Van Os demonstrated a solid performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, placing in the top 56% overall and top 62% in his age group. His overall time was 01:39:13, with a total running time of 00:50:00, slightly slower than average by 01:09, indicating a slight edge in strength over running. Notably, Quinten performed better than average in several strength-based segments such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, showcasing his proficiency in these areas. However, his pacing strategy could be adjusted; he started the race relatively slower in the initial running segments but gained speed in the latter parts, suggesting he could benefit from a more consistent pace throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Antonenkov Sergii | 2024 Gdansk | 01:38:51 | |
| Ravissot Eddy | 2024 Paris | 01:39:36 | |
| Hartley Rob | 2022 London | 01:39:04 | |
| Mcdowall Robert | 2023 Birmingham | 01:38:47 | |
| Park Tim | 2024 Anaheim | 01:39:12 | |
| Chessa Davide | 2024 Gdansk | 01:39:12 | |
| Meredith Grant | 2024 Brisbane | 01:39:27 | |
| Derucki Tobias | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:38:44 | |
| De Vlieg Joep | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:39:40 | |
| Orasklitschew Michael | 2023 Köln | 01:39:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:52:55 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
