Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Singapore using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Soy Jeff's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Soy Jeff's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Soy Jeff's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Soy Jeff's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:41 | 07:42 to 06:01 | 29.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:21 | 06:19 to 04:58 | 23.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:12 | 06:00 to 04:48 | 20.8% |
| Run Total | 01:00 | 42:29 to 41:29 | 17.3% |
| Rowing | 00:25 | 05:08 to 04:43 | 7.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:05 | 04:41 to 04:36 | 1.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:04 to 02:02 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Soy Jeff | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:15 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 04:15 | 04:26 -00:10 | 04:35 -00:20 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 08:31 | 04:56 -00:05 | 09:01 -00:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:09 | 13:22 | 02:52 -00:43 | 13:57 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 05:16 | 15:31 | 05:23 -00:07 | 16:49 -01:18 |
| Sled Pull | 04:41 | 20:47 | 04:53 -00:12 | 22:12 -01:25 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 25:28 | 05:21 -00:02 | 27:05 -01:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:19 | 30:47 | 05:17 +01:02 | 32:26 -01:39 |
| Running 5 | 05:57 | 37:06 | 05:31 +00:26 | 37:43 -00:37 |
| Rowing | 05:08 | 43:03 | 04:48 +00:20 | 43:14 -00:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 48:11 | 05:22 -00:02 | 48:02 +00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 53:31 | 02:10 -00:06 | 53:24 +00:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:21 | 55:35 | 05:22 -00:01 | 55:34 +00:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:00 | 01:00:56 | 05:04 +00:56 | 01:00:56 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 06:12 | 01:06:56 | 05:57 +00:15 | 01:06:00 +00:56 |
| Wall Balls | 07:42 | 01:13:08 | 06:28 +01:14 | 01:11:57 +01:11 |
| Roxzone | 04:30 | 01:25:13 | 06:48 -02:18 | 01:25:13 |
Jeff Soy demonstrated a commendable overall performance, securing the 162nd position in the race and ranking 24th in his age group. He finished in the top 14% of all athletes and top 12% in his age category, reflecting a strong competitive spirit. His total running time of 42:29 was notably faster than the average by 22 seconds, indicating a solid running profile. Jeff excelled in the initial running segments, with his best lap being 4:51, suggesting a well-managed pace at the start. However, his performance in strength-based exercises, particularly in the later stages, suggests room for improvement in transitioning from running to strength activities and maintaining pace. Jeff's pacing indicates a tendency to start fast, as observed from his first four running segments, which could have impacted his energy levels in subsequent strength components.
Despite a strong start, Jeff's performance in strength-based exercises lagged behind. Key areas for improvement include:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Marmo Alessandro | 2023 Milan | 01:25:08 | |
| Donner Heinrich | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:25:32 | |
| Graham Elliott | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:25:20 | |
| Mesquita Luis | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:24:49 | |
| Beganovic Tarik | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:02 | |
| Prejean Ashton | 2024 Dallas | 01:25:13 | |
| Wippersteg Michael | 2022 Essen | 01:25:05 | |
| Deubert Felix | 2018 Hamburg | 01:25:40 | |
| Johnston David | 2024 Berlin | 01:24:47 | |
| Willis Mark | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Stockholm | 01:27:14 | |
| 2023 New York | 01:37:51 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
