Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Scherpenhuyzen Stephanie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Scherpenhuyzen Stephanie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Scherpenhuyzen Stephanie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Scherpenhuyzen Stephanie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:34 | 07:55 to 06:21 | 40.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:26 | 06:26 to 05:00 | 36.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:45 | 05:41 to 04:56 | 19.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 02:51 to 02:46 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 05:12 to 05:09 | 1.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 47:08 to 47:08 | 0.0% |
| Scherpenhuyzen Stephanie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:58 | 00:00 | 05:20 -01:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:12 | 03:58 | 05:12 +00:00 | 05:20 -01:22 |
| Running 2 | 05:35 | 09:10 | 05:46 -00:11 | 10:32 -01:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:51 | 14:45 | 02:51 +00:00 | 16:18 -01:33 |
| Running 3 | 05:51 | 17:36 | 06:05 -00:14 | 19:09 -01:33 |
| Sled Pull | 04:59 | 23:27 | 06:05 -01:06 | 25:14 -01:47 |
| Running 4 | 05:57 | 28:26 | 06:04 -00:07 | 31:19 -02:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:55 | 34:23 | 06:39 +01:16 | 37:23 -03:00 |
| Running 5 | 06:23 | 42:18 | 06:14 +00:09 | 44:02 -01:44 |
| Rowing | 05:24 | 48:41 | 05:29 -00:05 | 50:16 -01:35 |
| Running 6 | 06:25 | 54:05 | 06:06 +00:19 | 55:45 -01:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 01:00:30 | 02:22 -00:22 | 01:01:51 -01:21 |
| Running 7 | 06:05 | 01:02:30 | 06:05 +00:00 | 01:04:13 -01:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:41 | 01:08:35 | 05:06 +00:35 | 01:10:18 -01:43 |
| Running 8 | 06:57 | 01:14:16 | 06:37 +00:20 | 01:15:24 -01:08 |
| Wall Balls | 06:26 | 01:21:13 | 05:26 +01:00 | 01:22:01 -00:48 |
| Roxzone | 07:28 | 01:35:01 | 07:34 -00:06 | 01:35:01 |
Stephanie Scherpenhuyzen delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing a top 18% overall rank and matching this achievement within her age group. Her total running time was notably 1:54 faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. This suggests that while she excels in running, there is an opportunity to enhance her strength-based exercises to balance her overall performance. Stephanie started the race with a very fast pace in the initial running segments, particularly in Running 1, which might have led to fatigue in subsequent segments.
By focusing on these targeted improvements and strategic adjustments, Stephanie can enhance her overall race performance, leveraging her strong running ability while developing her strength segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Offringa Jildou | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:38 | |
| Mitchell Charlotte | 2024 Manchester | 01:35:21 | |
| Sharkey Sarah | 2024 Dublin | 01:34:53 | |
| Howlett Leanne | 2024 Madrid | 01:34:45 | |
| Jacobs Tinne | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:35:06 | |
| Lingen Wilma | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:34:49 | |
| Yoneyama Masumi | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:35:25 | |
| Steele Lucy | 2024 London | 01:34:35 | |
| Dahncke Stefanie | 2019 Hamburg | 01:34:42 | |
| Dzido Isia | 2023 London | 01:34:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:39:13 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:54 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
