Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Cape Town using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ocker Dyllan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ocker Dyllan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ocker Dyllan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ocker Dyllan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:28 | 54:53 to 49:25 | 81.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:42 | 05:26 to 04:44 | 10.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:31 | 06:51 to 06:20 | 7.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:45 to 05:45 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:39 to 05:39 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:37 to 07:37 | 0.0% |
| Ocker Dyllan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:50 | 00:00 | 05:16 +00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:26 | 05:50 | 04:43 +00:43 | 05:16 +00:34 |
| Running 2 | 05:56 | 11:16 | 05:47 +00:09 | 09:59 +01:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 17:12 | 03:29 -01:04 | 15:46 +01:26 |
| Running 3 | 07:05 | 19:37 | 06:21 +00:44 | 19:15 +00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 05:45 | 26:42 | 06:04 -00:19 | 25:36 +01:06 |
| Running 4 | 07:04 | 32:27 | 06:20 +00:44 | 31:40 +00:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:39 | 39:31 | 07:01 -01:22 | 38:00 +01:31 |
| Running 5 | 07:12 | 45:10 | 06:37 +00:35 | 45:01 +00:09 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 52:22 | 05:13 -00:22 | 51:38 +00:44 |
| Running 6 | 06:55 | 57:13 | 06:25 +00:30 | 56:51 +00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 01:04:08 | 02:36 -00:06 | 01:03:16 +00:52 |
| Running 7 | 07:06 | 01:06:38 | 06:26 +00:40 | 01:05:52 +00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:51 | 01:13:44 | 06:34 +00:17 | 01:12:18 +01:26 |
| Running 8 | 07:50 | 01:20:35 | 07:34 +00:16 | 01:18:52 +01:43 |
| Wall Balls | 07:37 | 01:28:25 | 08:35 -00:58 | 01:26:26 +01:59 |
| Roxzone | 08:22 | 01:44:16 | 09:15 -00:53 | 01:44:16 |
Dyllan Ocker's performance in the 2024 Cape Town Hyrox was commendable, finishing in the top 50% overall and top 58% in his age group. His overall time was 01:44:16. Notably, Dyllan showed strength in exercises such as the Sled Push and Burpees Broad Jump, significantly outperforming the average. However, his total running time fell short by 03:39 compared to the average, indicating a need for improvement in his running ability. His initial running segments suggest he started at a moderate pace but progressively slowed down, hinting at potential fatigue management issues. Overall, Dyllan exhibits a more balanced profile, with room for improvement in both running and strength endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lindemann Martin | 2023 München | 01:44:20 | |
| Neill Oscar | 2024 Glasgow | 01:44:44 | |
| Haynes John | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:44:42 | |
| Smyth David | 2024 Dublin | 01:43:51 | |
| Thomas James | 2022 Dallas | 01:44:34 | |
| McCarthy Brian | 2024 Stockholm | 01:44:40 | |
| Chan Bohui | 2024 Singapore | 01:43:57 | |
| Slater Anthony | 2024 Birmingham | 01:44:31 | |
| Knobloch Janko | 2022 Hamburg | 01:44:21 | |
| Barraque Florian | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:44:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
