Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nowak Quentin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nowak Quentin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nowak Quentin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nowak Quentin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:22 | 45:04 to 38:42 | 94.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:13 | 02:37 to 02:24 | 3.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:22 to 04:14 | 2.0% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:37 to 04:34 | 0.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:26 to 03:26 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Nowak Quentin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:11 | 00:00 | 04:20 +00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 05:11 | 04:20 +00:02 | 04:20 +00:51 |
| Running 2 | 04:41 | 09:33 | 04:41 +00:00 | 08:40 +00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 14:14 | 02:41 -00:04 | 13:21 +00:53 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 16:51 | 05:04 +00:32 | 16:02 +00:49 |
| Sled Pull | 03:26 | 22:27 | 04:30 -01:04 | 21:06 +01:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 25:53 | 05:04 +00:34 | 25:36 +00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:06 | 31:31 | 04:46 -00:40 | 30:40 +00:51 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 35:37 | 05:12 +00:23 | 35:26 +00:11 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 41:12 | 04:40 -00:03 | 40:38 +00:34 |
| Running 6 | 05:18 | 45:49 | 05:04 +00:14 | 45:18 +00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 51:07 | 02:01 -00:13 | 50:22 +00:45 |
| Running 7 | 05:29 | 52:55 | 05:03 +00:26 | 52:23 +00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:57 | 58:24 | 04:38 -00:41 | 57:26 +00:58 |
| Running 8 | 07:39 | 01:02:21 | 05:32 +02:07 | 01:02:04 +00:17 |
| Wall Balls | 04:52 | 01:10:00 | 05:51 -00:59 | 01:07:36 +02:24 |
| Roxzone | 04:44 | 01:19:29 | 06:02 -01:18 | 01:19:29 |
Based on his splits analysis, Quentin's total running time of 00:45:04 was 06:25 slower than the average. This suggests that he may need to focus more on improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap of 00:04:41 shows that he has the potential to perform well in running segments.
In conclusion, Quentin Nowak performed well in the HYROX race, but there are areas where he can improve his performance. By focusing on specific training strategies, such as interval training, endurance runs, and strength training exercises, Quentin can enhance his overall performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mckenna James | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:58 | |
| Kiene Florian | 2023 Bilbao | 01:19:32 | |
| Thees Jannik | 2024 Hamburg | 01:19:12 | |
| Medhurst Tom | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:19:23 | |
| Briault Daniel | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:02 | |
| Mcgarvey Brian | 2024 Dublin | 01:19:41 | |
| Dunne Ben | 2024 Berlin | 01:19:17 | |
| Rodríguez Alonso Ismael | 2024 Bilbao | 01:19:05 | |
| Lindeborg Thomas | 2023 Stockholm | 01:19:51 | |
| Morrison Andy | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:14:29 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
