Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nijhuis Lukas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nijhuis Lukas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nijhuis Lukas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nijhuis Lukas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:34 | 06:39 to 05:05 | 47.2% |
| Run Total | 00:43 | 42:42 to 41:59 | 21.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:30 | 06:38 to 06:08 | 15.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:18 | 03:03 to 02:45 | 9.0% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 04:59 to 04:45 | 7.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Nijhuis Lukas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:41 | 00:00 | 04:40 -00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 03:41 | 04:27 -00:09 | 04:40 -00:59 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 07:59 | 05:00 +00:16 | 09:07 -01:08 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 13:15 | 02:56 +00:07 | 14:07 -00:52 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 16:18 | 05:26 -00:04 | 17:03 -00:45 |
| Sled Pull | 04:30 | 21:40 | 05:00 -00:30 | 22:29 -00:49 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 26:10 | 05:25 +00:03 | 27:29 -01:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:39 | 31:38 | 05:22 +01:17 | 32:54 -01:16 |
| Running 5 | 05:32 | 38:17 | 05:35 -00:03 | 38:16 +00:01 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 43:49 | 04:50 +00:09 | 43:51 -00:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:09 | 48:48 | 05:28 -00:19 | 48:41 +00:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 53:57 | 02:12 -00:12 | 54:09 -00:12 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 55:57 | 05:26 -00:15 | 56:21 -00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:01 | 01:01:08 | 05:08 -01:07 | 01:01:47 -00:39 |
| Running 8 | 07:07 | 01:05:09 | 06:04 +01:03 | 01:06:55 -01:46 |
| Wall Balls | 06:38 | 01:12:16 | 06:34 +00:04 | 01:12:59 -00:43 |
| Roxzone | 07:46 | 01:26:31 | 06:58 +00:48 | 01:26:31 |
Pacing and Profile:
Lukas Nijhuis displayed a balanced profile in terms of running and strength exercises. His total running time of 00:42:42 was 01:12 slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from focusing more on his running training. It is important for him to prioritize building his running endurance and speed to improve his overall race performance.
In conclusion, Lukas Nijhuis demonstrated strong performance in the 2023 Amsterdam Hyrox race, but there are areas that can be improved upon. By focusing on specific segments, incorporating targeted training strategies, and implementing effective race strategies, he can enhance his overall performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Colless Ben | 2023 Sydney | 01:26:02 | |
| Baker Bjorn | 2024 Melbourne | 01:26:54 | |
| Wagner Udo | 2023 Köln | 01:26:55 | |
| Di Paola Roberto | 2024 Rimini | 01:26:40 | |
| Hind Matthew | 2024 Manchester | 01:26:26 | |
| Behme Jannik | 2024 Berlin | 01:26:29 | |
| De Rooij Kas | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:26:38 | |
| Rosenlund Jeff | 2024 Melbourne | 01:26:53 | |
| Güttler Louis | 2024 Hamburg | 01:26:49 | |
| Hollingworth Liam | 2024 Dublin | 01:26:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:31:36 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
