Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mols Bart's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mols Bart's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mols Bart's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mols Bart's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:56 | 10:12 to 07:16 | 83.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:19 | 05:59 to 05:40 | 9.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:17 | 02:39 to 02:22 | 8.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:01 to 03:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:12 to 45:12 | 0.0% |
| Mols Bart | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:16 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 05:16 | 04:36 -00:11 | 04:58 +00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 09:41 | 05:24 -00:22 | 09:34 +00:07 |
| Sled Push | 03:01 | 14:43 | 03:14 -00:13 | 14:58 -00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:29 | 17:44 | 05:53 -00:24 | 18:12 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 05:20 | 23:13 | 05:37 -00:17 | 24:05 -00:52 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 28:33 | 05:54 -00:19 | 29:42 -01:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:32 | 34:08 | 06:20 -00:48 | 35:36 -01:28 |
| Running 5 | 06:02 | 39:40 | 06:08 -00:06 | 41:56 -02:16 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 45:42 | 05:03 -00:10 | 48:04 -02:22 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 50:35 | 05:56 -00:19 | 53:07 -02:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:39 | 56:12 | 02:26 +00:13 | 59:03 -02:51 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 58:51 | 05:55 -00:13 | 01:01:29 -02:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:59 | 01:04:33 | 05:55 +00:04 | 01:07:24 -02:51 |
| Running 8 | 06:33 | 01:10:32 | 06:49 -00:16 | 01:13:19 -02:47 |
| Wall Balls | 10:12 | 01:17:05 | 07:41 +02:31 | 01:20:08 -03:03 |
| Roxzone | 08:49 | 01:35:58 | 08:09 +00:40 | 01:35:58 |
Examining Bart Mols' performance in the 2024 Rotterdam HYROX race reveals a strong overall ranking, placing in the top 43% of all athletes and top 34% in his age group. His total running time was 02:07 faster than the average, indicating a clear strength in running, which suggests a more runner-oriented profile. However, certain areas, particularly strength-focused exercises, require improvement to achieve a more balanced athlete profile. Bart's pacing appeared strategic, starting slightly slower than average in the initial run but consistently gaining pace, which is commendable for maintaining energy throughout the race.
Improving in these identified areas, along with maintaining his running prowess, will provide Bart Mols a more balanced profile as an athlete. This holistic approach, focusing on both strengths and weaknesses, will undoubtedly lead to better future race performances.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hussain Isaac | 2024 Berlin | 01:35:56 | |
| Copeland Kenneth | 2022 Dallas | 01:36:17 | |
| Christie Mathew | 2022 Manchester | 01:35:30 | |
| Dwars Thomas | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:36:00 | |
| Bardell Mike | 2024 London | 01:36:06 | |
| Marshall John | 2023 Glasgow | 01:36:06 | |
| Vazquez Gabino Faustino | 2024 Hamburg | 01:35:38 | |
| Vásquez Nathan | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:35:35 | |
| Verweij Coen | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:35:54 | |
| Walsh Joe | 2024 Manchester | 01:35:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:21 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
