Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mitchell Chad's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mitchell Chad's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mitchell Chad's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mitchell Chad's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:46 | 47:51 to 46:05 | 40.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:17 | 07:20 to 06:03 | 29.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:08 | 08:24 to 07:16 | 26.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 05:51 to 05:40 | 4.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:00 to 04:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:58 to 02:58 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Mitchell Chad | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:45 | 00:00 | 04:59 -01:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:00 | 03:45 | 04:36 -00:36 | 04:59 -01:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 07:45 | 05:23 +00:04 | 09:35 -01:50 |
| Sled Push | 02:58 | 13:12 | 03:13 -00:15 | 14:58 -01:46 |
| Running 3 | 05:55 | 16:10 | 05:52 +00:03 | 18:11 -02:01 |
| Sled Pull | 04:21 | 22:05 | 05:33 -01:12 | 24:03 -01:58 |
| Running 4 | 06:04 | 26:26 | 05:52 +00:12 | 29:36 -03:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:20 | 32:30 | 06:18 +01:02 | 35:28 -02:58 |
| Running 5 | 06:22 | 39:50 | 06:07 +00:15 | 41:46 -01:56 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 46:12 | 05:03 -00:21 | 47:53 -01:41 |
| Running 6 | 06:18 | 50:54 | 05:55 +00:23 | 52:56 -02:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 57:12 | 02:26 -00:07 | 58:51 -01:39 |
| Running 7 | 06:23 | 59:31 | 05:54 +00:29 | 01:01:17 -01:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:51 | 01:05:54 | 05:53 -00:02 | 01:07:11 -01:17 |
| Running 8 | 07:41 | 01:11:45 | 06:49 +00:52 | 01:13:04 -01:19 |
| Wall Balls | 08:24 | 01:19:26 | 07:38 +00:46 | 01:19:53 -00:27 |
| Roxzone | 07:59 | 01:35:39 | 08:08 -00:09 | 01:35:39 |
Chad Mitchell competed in the 2024 Manchester HYROX event, finishing within the top 81% of athletes overall. Despite a slower Total Running time than the average, he demonstrated a consistent performance across several segments, including Ski Erg and Sled Pull, where he surpassed the average timings. However, his performance in strength-based exercises like the Burpees Broad Jump and Wall Balls was below average, indicating a need for improvements in these areas. His fast start in Running 1 might suggest an over-zealous approach, which could have led to exhaustion and slower times in later segments.
Chad should focus on pacing himself better during the race. Going out too fast in the initial segments can lead to exhaustion and slower times in later stages. He should aim for a steady pace throughout, saving energy for the strength-based exercises where he appears to struggle. Practicing the sequence of exercises in the lead-up to the race can also help prepare his body for the transitions between running and strength-based exercises, improving his overall time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fix Wladimir | 2024 Hamburg | 01:36:03 | |
| Chui Ken | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:35:56 | |
| Rice Shane | 2024 Birmingham | 01:35:56 | |
| Carty James | 2024 Glasgow | 01:35:55 | |
| De Haan Roy | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:35:47 | |
| Lo Ocean | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:35:36 | |
| Matz Martin | 2021 Hamburg | 01:35:11 | |
| Russell Matt | 2023 London | 01:35:48 | |
| Brehm Christopher | 2023 Paris | 01:35:57 | |
| Andres Cutillas Carlos | 2023 Madrid | 01:35:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
