Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mills Laura's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mills Laura's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mills Laura's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mills Laura's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:30 | 46:25 to 43:55 | 55.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:06 | 06:35 to 05:29 | 24.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:27 | 02:31 to 02:04 | 10.0% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 05:27 to 05:12 | 5.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:07 | 05:15 to 05:08 | 2.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:06 | 02:33 to 02:27 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Mills Laura | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:26 | 00:00 | 05:01 -00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:50 | 04:26 | 05:03 -00:13 | 05:01 -00:35 |
| Running 2 | 05:49 | 09:16 | 05:20 +00:29 | 10:04 -00:48 |
| Sled Push | 02:33 | 15:05 | 02:40 -00:07 | 15:24 -00:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:56 | 17:38 | 05:36 +00:20 | 18:04 -00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 05:15 | 23:34 | 05:34 -00:19 | 23:40 -00:06 |
| Running 4 | 06:11 | 28:49 | 05:39 +00:32 | 29:14 -00:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:35 | 35:00 | 05:49 +00:46 | 34:53 +00:07 |
| Running 5 | 06:08 | 41:35 | 05:47 +00:21 | 40:42 +00:53 |
| Rowing | 05:27 | 47:43 | 05:18 +00:09 | 46:29 +01:14 |
| Running 6 | 06:01 | 53:10 | 05:41 +00:20 | 51:47 +01:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:31 | 59:11 | 02:11 +00:20 | 57:28 +01:43 |
| Running 7 | 05:55 | 01:01:42 | 05:40 +00:15 | 59:39 +02:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:14 | 01:07:37 | 04:36 -00:22 | 01:05:19 +02:18 |
| Running 8 | 06:04 | 01:11:51 | 06:04 +00:00 | 01:09:55 +01:56 |
| Wall Balls | 03:44 | 01:17:55 | 04:45 -01:01 | 01:15:59 +01:56 |
| Roxzone | 05:51 | 01:27:21 | 06:37 -00:46 | 01:27:21 |
Based on the splits analysis, Laura performed above average in the Running 1 and Ski Erg segments, with a faster time than the average. However, she struggled in the Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, Rowing, and Farmers Carry segments, with slower times compared to the average.
In conclusion, Laura Mills had a strong performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race, placing in the top 12% overall and in her age group. To improve her performance, she should focus on improving her running endurance and speed, building strength and power in her lower body, and working on efficient transitions between exercises. Implementing race strategies such as pacing, mental preparation, and proper nutrition and hydration will also contribute to her success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Niemierza Stephanie | 2018 Essen | 01:27:13 | |
| Huddleston Laura | 2024 Dallas | 01:27:28 | |
| Worthington Helena | 2021 Birmingham | 01:27:00 | |
| Jungmann Sandra | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:27:12 | |
| Pinks Laura | 2022 London | 01:27:01 | |
| O Shea Aoife | 2024 Dublin | 01:27:18 | |
| Hilgenrainer Lisa | 2019 Hamburg | 01:26:59 | |
| Hicks Kelsey | 2023 Dallas | 01:27:43 | |
| Tytgat Justine | 2024 Stockholm | 01:27:08 | |
| Arimbado Nadia | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:27:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:22:34 | |
| 2024 Sydney | 01:26:09 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
