Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
993 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 993 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 993 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 993 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
03:31.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 993 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Joël Laffon showcased a strong performance in the 2024 Poznan HYROX race. While ranking in the top 86% of all athletes and the top 90% in his age group, Laffon's performance highlighted his prowess in running, with his total running time being 03:50 faster than the average. His best running lap, recorded at 00:05:19, further underlines his running efficiency. Laffon's performance across the initial segments from Running 1 to Running 4 suggests a well-paced start, with times generally faster than the average. In terms of profile, Laffon leans more towards a runner profile than a strength profile, suggesting a potential area for focus and improvement in future training.
Segments to Improve:
Roxzone: Laffon's Roxzone time was slower than average by 02:53, indicating more time spent resting or transitioning between exercise zones. Improving overall fitness and reducing transition time would be beneficial. Transition drills, practicing moving quickly and efficiently between different exercises, could be incorporated into his training routine.
Sandbag Lunges: Laffon's Sandbag Lunges segment was slower by 02:32 than the average, suggesting a need for improved strength and endurance in this area. Incorporating more lunges and strength training into workout routines could help improve performance in this segment.
Burpees Broad Jump: This segment was slower than average by 00:06, indicating a potential area for improvement. Plyometric exercises, specifically focusing on broad jumps, could be beneficial to increase explosive power.
Sled Pull: This segment was slower by 00:07 than average, hinting at a need to build more lower body strength and improve sled-pulling technique. Specific sled pull drills and strength training focused on the lower body could help improve performance in this area.
Race Strategies:
In future races, Laffon should focus on maintaining his strong running performance while improving his transitions between exercise zones. He may also benefit from starting off at a slightly slower pace to conserve energy for the more strength-intensive segments towards the end of the race. Furthermore, paying particular attention to maintaining proper form during the strength segments could lead to improvements in his overall timing. Since Laffon seems to have a stronger running profile, focusing on strength training in his workouts will help balance his performance.