Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Froom Milan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Froom Milan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Froom Milan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Froom Milan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:33 | 07:17 to 04:44 | 47.1% |
| Run Total | 00:58 | 42:07 to 41:09 | 17.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:54 | 05:47 to 04:53 | 16.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:41 | 06:36 to 05:55 | 12.6% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:53 to 04:42 | 3.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:29 to 04:21 | 2.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Froom Milan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:37 | 00:00 | 04:34 +00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 04:37 | 04:25 +00:04 | 04:34 +00:03 |
| Running 2 | 04:25 | 09:06 | 04:54 -00:29 | 08:59 +00:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:05 | 13:31 | 02:52 -00:47 | 13:53 -00:22 |
| Running 3 | 04:38 | 15:36 | 05:21 -00:43 | 16:45 -01:09 |
| Sled Pull | 03:53 | 20:14 | 04:51 -00:58 | 22:06 -01:52 |
| Running 4 | 04:45 | 24:07 | 05:19 -00:34 | 26:57 -02:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:47 | 28:52 | 05:12 +00:35 | 32:16 -03:24 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 34:39 | 05:29 -00:01 | 37:28 -02:49 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 40:07 | 04:47 +00:06 | 42:57 -02:50 |
| Running 6 | 04:56 | 45:00 | 05:20 -00:24 | 47:44 -02:44 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 49:56 | 02:08 -00:10 | 53:04 -03:08 |
| Running 7 | 04:44 | 51:54 | 05:20 -00:36 | 55:12 -03:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:17 | 56:38 | 04:59 +02:18 | 01:00:32 -03:54 |
| Running 8 | 08:37 | 01:03:55 | 05:55 +02:42 | 01:05:31 -01:36 |
| Wall Balls | 06:36 | 01:12:32 | 06:20 +00:16 | 01:11:26 +01:06 |
| Roxzone | 05:24 | 01:24:24 | 06:38 -01:14 | 01:24:24 |
Milan Froom's performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event was commendable, placing him in the top 31% overall and top 30% within his age group. His total running time was notably faster than average, which indicates his strength as a runner. His running splits, especially from Running 2 to Running 7, were consistently faster than average, showcasing his ability to maintain a strong pace throughout the race. However, his early segments suggest a slightly conservative start, as his Running 1 split was slower than average. This indicates a potential area for improved race pacing strategy. Overall, Milan exhibits a strong running profile with room for enhancement in certain strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Perrotin Thomas | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:24:41 | |
| Brown Jamie | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:24 | |
| Rother Thomas | 2024 Malaga | 01:24:09 | |
| Van Den Berg Derwin | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:24:18 | |
| Lynch David | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:24:46 | |
| Martin Stephen | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:37 | |
| Mc Gailey Jack | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:50 | |
| Johnston Christian | 2023 Sydney | 01:24:17 | |
| Tierney Peter | 2023 Dublin | 01:24:16 | |
| Pennie Brian | 2024 Dublin | 01:24:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
