Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Der Loop Michel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Der Loop Michel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Der Loop Michel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Der Loop Michel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:42 | 49:27 to 46:45 | 51.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:21 | 07:34 to 06:13 | 25.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:49 | 06:37 to 05:48 | 15.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 | 05:00 to 04:37 | 7.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:03 to 03:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:42 to 06:42 | 0.0% |
| Van Der Loop Michel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:17 | 00:00 | 05:01 -00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 04:17 | 04:38 +00:22 | 05:01 -00:44 |
| Running 2 | 06:06 | 09:17 | 05:26 +00:40 | 09:39 -00:22 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 15:23 | 03:18 -00:15 | 15:05 +00:18 |
| Running 3 | 06:30 | 18:26 | 05:58 +00:32 | 18:23 +00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 04:24 | 24:56 | 05:42 -01:18 | 24:21 +00:35 |
| Running 4 | 06:27 | 29:20 | 05:58 +00:29 | 30:03 -00:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:34 | 35:47 | 06:27 +01:07 | 36:01 -00:14 |
| Running 5 | 06:30 | 43:21 | 06:14 +00:16 | 42:28 +00:53 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 49:51 | 05:05 -00:22 | 48:42 +01:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:19 | 54:34 | 06:02 +00:17 | 53:47 +00:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 01:00:53 | 02:27 -00:18 | 59:49 +01:04 |
| Running 7 | 06:21 | 01:03:02 | 06:02 +00:19 | 01:02:16 +00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:37 | 01:09:23 | 06:01 +00:36 | 01:08:18 +01:05 |
| Running 8 | 07:00 | 01:16:00 | 06:59 +00:01 | 01:14:19 +01:41 |
| Wall Balls | 06:42 | 01:23:00 | 07:52 -01:10 | 01:21:18 +01:42 |
| Roxzone | 07:52 | 01:37:27 | 08:17 -00:25 | 01:37:27 |
Based on the splits analysis, Michel performed well in the Running 1 segment, completing it 00:33 faster than the average. He also had strong performances in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments, finishing 00:39 and 01:42 faster than the average, respectively. However, he struggled in several segments, including Burpees Broad Jump, Running 2, Sandbag Lunges, Running 3, Running 4, Ski Erg, Running 7, Running 5, and Running 6, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas for improvement, Michel can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Laird Kyle | 2021 Los Angeles | 01:37:29 | |
| Nakka Nikhil | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:37:26 | |
| Ali Abid | 2021 London | 01:37:31 | |
| Panganiban Jesus | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:37:19 | |
| Parsons David | 2023 Manchester | 01:37:21 | |
| Norhazim Lukman | 2023 Singapore | 01:37:18 | |
| Swinburne Sean | 2024 Birmingham | 01:37:01 | |
| 郭 骁 | 2024 Beijing | 01:37:01 | |
| Gooda Chris | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:37:11 | |
| Dickson Christy | 2024 Dublin | 01:37:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:53:46 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:34:04 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:42:50 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
