Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tam Steven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tam Steven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tam Steven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tam Steven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:43 | 50:00 to 44:17 | 87.3% |
| Rowing | 00:27 | 05:20 to 04:53 | 6.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:21 | 05:58 to 05:37 | 5.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:32 to 04:30 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:48 to 02:48 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Tam Steven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:56 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 03:56 | 04:33 -00:01 | 04:46 -00:50 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 08:28 | 05:14 +00:17 | 09:19 -00:51 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 13:59 | 03:07 -00:19 | 14:33 -00:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:51 | 16:47 | 05:44 +00:07 | 17:40 -00:53 |
| Sled Pull | 04:20 | 22:38 | 05:21 -01:01 | 23:24 -00:46 |
| Running 4 | 06:01 | 26:58 | 05:43 +00:18 | 28:45 -01:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:58 | 32:59 | 05:55 +00:03 | 34:28 -01:29 |
| Running 5 | 06:11 | 38:57 | 05:54 +00:17 | 40:23 -01:26 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 45:08 | 04:57 +00:23 | 46:17 -01:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:44 | 50:28 | 05:44 +01:00 | 51:14 -00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 57:12 | 02:20 -00:24 | 56:58 +00:14 |
| Running 7 | 09:08 | 59:08 | 05:43 +03:25 | 59:18 -00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:36 | 01:08:16 | 05:33 -00:57 | 01:05:01 +03:15 |
| Running 8 | 06:41 | 01:12:52 | 06:28 +00:13 | 01:10:34 +02:18 |
| Wall Balls | 05:08 | 01:19:33 | 07:11 -02:03 | 01:17:02 +02:31 |
| Roxzone | 07:13 | 01:31:46 | 07:33 -00:20 | 01:31:46 |
Steven Tam delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing within the top 45% overall and top 30% in his age group, 55-59. His overall time was 01:31:46, demonstrating a balanced approach to both running and strength events. However, his total running time was 04:20 slower than the average, indicating potential areas for improvement in running efficiency. The best running lap time was 00:05:31, which suggests the capacity for better pacing. While Steven displayed a strong performance in strength-based segments, particularly with the Wall Balls and Sandbag Lunges, his overall profile indicates a need to enhance running endurance and efficiency for a more balanced hybrid performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bruno Claudio | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:31:25 | |
| Benassi Marco | 2024 Milan | 01:31:34 | |
| Van Heijster Jaap | 2024 Maastricht | 01:31:32 | |
| Mcginn Andrew | 2023 Singapore | 01:32:07 | |
| Capilla Ocaña Miguel | 2022 Madrid | 01:31:26 | |
| Seel Tobias | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:31:53 | |
| Klootwijk Theo | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:31:37 | |
| Blekkenhorst Nick | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:31:57 | |
| Cua Dave | 2023 Singapore | 01:31:41 | |
| Ferrero Alessandro | 2024 Rimini | 01:31:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:29:17 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:49:47 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:31:29 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
