Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Potter Mike's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Potter Mike's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Potter Mike's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Potter Mike's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 10:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 05:13 | 12:41 to 07:28 | 48.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:07 | 09:20 to 06:13 | 29.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:59 | 07:47 to 05:48 | 18.5% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:12 to 05:02 | 1.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:05 | 05:38 to 05:33 | 0.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 03:19 to 03:15 | 0.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:29 to 02:25 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:55 to 41:55 | 0.0% |
| Potter Mike | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:09 | 00:00 | 05:02 -01:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 03:09 | 04:38 -00:06 | 05:02 -01:53 |
| Running 2 | 04:29 | 07:41 | 05:28 -00:59 | 09:40 -01:59 |
| Sled Push | 03:19 | 12:10 | 03:18 +00:01 | 15:08 -02:58 |
| Running 3 | 04:44 | 15:29 | 05:59 -01:15 | 18:26 -02:57 |
| Sled Pull | 05:38 | 20:13 | 05:41 -00:03 | 24:25 -04:12 |
| Running 4 | 04:39 | 25:51 | 06:00 -01:21 | 30:06 -04:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:20 | 30:30 | 06:26 +02:54 | 36:06 -05:36 |
| Running 5 | 10:26 | 39:50 | 06:15 +04:11 | 42:32 -02:42 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 50:16 | 05:06 +00:06 | 48:47 +01:29 |
| Running 6 | 04:40 | 55:28 | 06:03 -01:23 | 53:53 +01:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 01:00:08 | 02:27 +00:02 | 59:56 +00:12 |
| Running 7 | 04:40 | 01:02:37 | 06:03 -01:23 | 01:02:23 +00:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:47 | 01:07:17 | 06:03 +01:44 | 01:08:26 -01:09 |
| Running 8 | 05:10 | 01:15:04 | 07:01 -01:51 | 01:14:29 +00:35 |
| Wall Balls | 12:41 | 01:20:14 | 07:51 +04:50 | 01:21:30 -01:16 |
| Roxzone | 04:50 | 01:37:37 | 08:16 -03:26 | 01:37:37 |
Mike Potter showed a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race. His overall ranking places him in the top 84% of all athletes and the top 77% in his age group which is a significant achievement. His total running time of 00:41:55 was quicker than the average by 06:09, indicating a strong inclination towards a runner's profile. He started off the race at a faster pace than average in the initial running segments, maintaining this pace throughout the majority of the race. His transitions between the exercise zones were faster than average, suggesting a good level of overall fitness and efficient transition time.
Mike should consider focusing more on his pacing during the race. While his initial segments were faster than average, his later running segments saw a drop in performance. He should aim to conserve energy in the initial stages and maintain a steady pace throughout the race. He could also benefit from incorporating more strength training into his routine, as his performance in strength-based segments was generally slower than average.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shifflett Heath | 2022 Dallas | 01:37:20 | |
| Hammond Christopher | 2023 Glasgow | 01:37:21 | |
| Tete Raffaele | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:37:28 | |
| Schmidt Sören | 2019 Hamburg | 01:38:01 | |
| Hübner Tobias | 2022 Essen | 01:37:22 | |
| Pichol Florian | 2024 Marseille | 01:37:07 | |
| Granados Amado | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:37:42 | |
| Morgan Mat | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:37:56 | |
| Fotheringham Matthew | 2024 Marseille | 01:37:16 | |
| Romijn Ruben | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:38:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:27:48 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
