Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcnally Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcnally Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcnally Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcnally Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:03 | 09:19 to 07:16 | 50.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 03:51 to 03:11 | 16.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:37 | 02:59 to 02:22 | 15.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:25 | 06:28 to 06:03 | 10.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 05:55 to 05:40 | 6.1% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:05 to 04:59 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:22 to 44:22 | 0.0% |
| Mcnally Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:57 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 05:57 | 04:36 -00:02 | 04:58 +00:59 |
| Running 2 | 05:03 | 10:31 | 05:23 -00:20 | 09:34 +00:57 |
| Sled Push | 03:51 | 15:34 | 03:13 +00:38 | 14:57 +00:37 |
| Running 3 | 05:16 | 19:25 | 05:52 -00:36 | 18:10 +01:15 |
| Sled Pull | 05:04 | 24:41 | 05:36 -00:32 | 24:02 +00:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 29:45 | 05:53 -00:35 | 29:38 +00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:28 | 35:03 | 06:20 +00:08 | 35:31 -00:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 41:31 | 06:08 -00:48 | 41:51 -00:20 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 46:51 | 05:03 +00:02 | 47:59 -01:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:33 | 51:56 | 05:56 -00:23 | 53:02 -01:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:59 | 57:29 | 02:27 +00:32 | 58:58 -01:29 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 01:00:28 | 05:54 -00:31 | 01:01:25 -00:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:55 | 01:05:51 | 05:54 +00:01 | 01:07:19 -01:28 |
| Running 8 | 06:37 | 01:11:46 | 06:48 -00:11 | 01:13:13 -01:27 |
| Wall Balls | 09:19 | 01:18:23 | 07:41 +01:38 | 01:20:01 -01:38 |
| Roxzone | 08:16 | 01:35:50 | 08:08 +00:08 | 01:35:50 |
Kevin McNally demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Madrid HYROX race, finishing in the top 49% of all participants and the top 37% of his age group. Notably, his total running time of 00:44:22 was faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. His best running lap was 00:05:03, suggesting a high level of endurance and speed.
However, despite his strong running performance, Kevin's roxzone time of 00:08:16 was slightly slower than average, indicating potential areas for improvement in transitions and overall fitness.
In terms of pacing, Kevin started slower than average on his first running segment but then consistently ran faster than average thereafter. This suggests that he might benefit from a more aggressive start in future races.
To improve his overall race performance, Kevin could consider the following strategies:
With these strategies and focused training, Kevin is well-positioned to improve his performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Casado Miguel | 2022 Valencia | 01:35:21 | |
| Kusch Ronald | 2023 Hannover | 01:36:16 | |
| Shaw Chris | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:17 | |
| Wood Jack | 2024 Gdansk | 01:35:40 | |
| Rodrguez Ordez Kilian | 2023 Barcelona | 01:36:08 | |
| Gruber Christian | 2019 Wien | 01:35:27 | |
| Mainwaring Chris | 2023 Malaga | 01:35:35 | |
| Obst Guido | 2019 Essen | 01:35:41 | |
| Benjamin Deroche | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:36:03 | |
| Candelas Navarro Andres | 2023 Barcelona | 01:36:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Dublin | 01:40:14 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:33:14 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
