Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Rimini using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 999 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cino Irene's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cino Irene's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cino Irene's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cino Irene's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:49 | 56:49 to 48:00 | 98.9% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:34 to 05:28 | 1.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:17 to 02:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:43 to 01:43 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:16 to 03:16 | 0.0% |
| Cino Irene | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:21 | 00:00 | 05:24 -02:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 03:21 | 05:14 -00:18 | 05:24 -02:03 |
| Running 2 | 08:12 | 08:17 | 05:47 +02:25 | 10:38 -02:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:17 | 16:29 | 02:56 -00:39 | 16:25 +00:04 |
| Running 3 | 08:31 | 18:46 | 06:06 +02:25 | 19:21 -00:35 |
| Sled Pull | 05:35 | 27:17 | 06:13 -00:38 | 25:27 +01:50 |
| Running 4 | 08:31 | 32:52 | 06:09 +02:22 | 31:40 +01:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:28 | 41:23 | 06:54 -02:26 | 37:49 +03:34 |
| Running 5 | 08:39 | 45:51 | 06:19 +02:20 | 44:43 +01:08 |
| Rowing | 05:34 | 54:30 | 05:32 +00:02 | 51:02 +03:28 |
| Running 6 | 06:12 | 01:00:04 | 06:11 +00:01 | 56:34 +03:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:43 | 01:06:16 | 02:25 -00:42 | 01:02:45 +03:31 |
| Running 7 | 06:22 | 01:07:59 | 06:10 +00:12 | 01:05:10 +02:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:22 | 01:14:21 | 05:15 -00:53 | 01:11:20 +03:01 |
| Running 8 | 07:03 | 01:18:43 | 06:46 +00:17 | 01:16:35 +02:08 |
| Wall Balls | 03:16 | 01:25:46 | 05:32 -02:16 | 01:23:21 +02:25 |
| Roxzone | 07:42 | 01:36:38 | 07:45 -00:03 | 01:36:38 |
Irene Cino's performance in the 2024 Rimini HYROX race places her impressively in the top 15% of all athletes and the top 17% in her age group, a commendable achievement. Her overall time of 01:36:38 highlights her strong competitive edge. Analysis of her splits reveals Irene is better at strength exercises than running, as indicated by her total running time being 07:11 slower than average. This suggests a hybrid athlete profile with a significant tilt towards strength. However, her initial running segment was considerably faster than average, suggesting a potential issue with pacing, starting too fast and then slowing down in subsequent runs.
By focusing on these areas of improvement and implementing the suggested strategies, Irene Cino has the potential to significantly enhance her performance in future HYROX races. Balancing her evident strength capabilities with improved running endurance and efficiency could see her climbing even higher in the rankings.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priest Annette | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:36:22 | |
| Benson Siobhan | 2024 Madrid | 01:36:09 | |
| Albertziok Mandy | 2024 Hamburg | 01:36:59 | |
| Kelly Kathy | 2024 Dublin | 01:36:26 | |
| Blowes Leah | 2022 New York | 01:36:37 | |
| Núñez García Ainhoa | 2021 Madrid | 01:36:53 | |
| Cramer Stine | 2024 Malaga | 01:36:55 | |
| Leow Faith | 2024 Incheon | 01:36:30 | |
| Carlin Nicola | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:39 | |
| Magee Nikki | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
