Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bishop Melanie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bishop Melanie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bishop Melanie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bishop Melanie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:40 | 46:50 to 43:10 | 57.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:36 | 06:54 to 05:18 | 25.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:41 | 04:46 to 04:05 | 10.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 04:35 to 04:17 | 4.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:10 to 02:01 | 2.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Bishop Melanie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:34 | 00:00 | 04:57 +01:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 06:34 | 05:01 -00:35 | 04:57 +01:37 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 11:00 | 05:17 +00:15 | 09:58 +01:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:22 | 16:32 | 02:36 -00:14 | 15:15 +01:17 |
| Running 3 | 05:50 | 18:54 | 05:33 +00:17 | 17:51 +01:03 |
| Sled Pull | 04:10 | 24:44 | 05:27 -01:17 | 23:24 +01:20 |
| Running 4 | 05:40 | 28:54 | 05:35 +00:05 | 28:51 +00:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:54 | 34:34 | 05:41 +01:13 | 34:26 +00:08 |
| Running 5 | 05:50 | 41:28 | 05:42 +00:08 | 40:07 +01:21 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 47:18 | 05:17 -00:29 | 45:49 +01:29 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 52:06 | 05:36 +00:03 | 51:06 +01:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 57:45 | 02:11 -00:01 | 56:42 +01:03 |
| Running 7 | 05:35 | 59:55 | 05:36 -00:01 | 58:53 +01:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:35 | 01:05:30 | 04:29 +00:06 | 01:04:29 +01:01 |
| Running 8 | 06:15 | 01:10:05 | 05:57 +00:18 | 01:08:58 +01:07 |
| Wall Balls | 04:46 | 01:16:20 | 04:36 +00:10 | 01:14:55 +01:25 |
| Roxzone | 04:57 | 01:25:54 | 06:23 -01:26 | 01:25:54 |
Melanie Bishop performed well in the HYROX race, finishing in the top 9% of all athletes and in the top 13% of her age group. Her overall time of 01:25:54 is commendable, but there are areas where she can improve her performance.
Melanie's total running time of 00:46:50 is 03:11 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she could benefit from improving her overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, her best running lap time of 00:05:32 is a strong indicator of her running ability.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested exercises, drills, and training routines, Melanie can enhance her performance in the identified areas of improvement. With consistent training and a focus on both strength and running, she can continue to excel in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Angus Laura | 2024 Manchester | 01:26:03 | |
| Bruce Amanda | 2024 London | 01:25:59 | |
| Mcwilliams Sarah | 2024 Dublin | 01:26:24 | |
| Grimm Sandra | 2023 Köln | 01:25:38 | |
| Callegari Katarina | 2024 Perth | 01:25:50 | |
| Ball Rebecca | 2022 New York | 01:26:23 | |
| Choi Hyerim | 2024 Incheon | 01:25:27 | |
| Oram Emma | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:26:19 | |
| Gardeslen Lisa | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:45 | |
| Rogerson Marion | 2024 Perth | 01:26:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
