Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Der Heijden Bart's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Der Heijden Bart's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Der Heijden Bart's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Der Heijden Bart's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:49 | 42:36 to 39:47 | 61.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:56 | 03:27 to 02:31 | 20.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:31 | 04:50 to 04:19 | 11.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:07 to 01:55 | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:22 to 04:17 | 1.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Van Der Heijden Bart | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:34 | 00:00 | 04:28 -00:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 03:34 | 04:23 -00:01 | 04:28 -00:54 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 07:56 | 04:46 +00:05 | 08:51 -00:55 |
| Sled Push | 03:27 | 12:47 | 02:46 +00:41 | 13:37 -00:50 |
| Running 3 | 05:27 | 16:14 | 05:10 +00:17 | 16:23 -00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 04:50 | 21:41 | 04:39 +00:11 | 21:33 +00:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 26:31 | 05:08 +00:27 | 26:12 +00:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:23 | 32:06 | 04:57 -00:34 | 31:20 +00:46 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 36:29 | 05:17 +00:11 | 36:17 +00:12 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 41:57 | 04:43 -00:21 | 41:34 +00:23 |
| Running 6 | 05:36 | 46:19 | 05:11 +00:25 | 46:17 +00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 51:55 | 02:05 +00:02 | 51:28 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:33 | 54:02 | 05:08 +00:25 | 53:33 +00:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:10 | 59:35 | 04:50 -00:40 | 58:41 +00:54 |
| Running 8 | 06:34 | 01:03:45 | 05:40 +00:54 | 01:03:31 +00:14 |
| Wall Balls | 05:15 | 01:10:19 | 06:05 -00:50 | 01:09:11 +01:08 |
| Roxzone | 06:08 | 01:21:37 | 06:21 -00:13 | 01:21:37 |
Based on the splits analysis, Bart's total running time of 00:42:36 was 03:07 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to reduce the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, his running performance was slightly slower than the average, suggesting that he could benefit from incorporating more running training into his routine.
In conclusion, Bart Van Der Heijden showed strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on improving his running speed and endurance, strengthening his lower body for sled pushing, and refining his running technique, he can further excel in future races. Implementing strategies for pacing, transitions, and mental preparation can also contribute to his success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Feichtenschlager Patrick | 2023 München | 01:21:38 | |
| Gharbaoui Tarik | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:15 | |
| Shook Joseph | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:21:18 | |
| Martínez Gómez Cristian | 2021 Madrid | 01:21:51 | |
| Noon Jack | 2023 London | 01:21:10 | |
| Lanfrey Etienne | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:21:51 | |
| Webster Todd | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:10 | |
| Berkhout Steven | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:21:37 | |
| Pöhl Julian | 2018 Hamburg | 01:21:15 | |
| Lynch David | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:21:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
