Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sauvage Léa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sauvage Léa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sauvage Léa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sauvage Léa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:33 | 06:41 to 05:08 | 41.3% |
| Sled Push | 01:01 | 03:28 to 02:27 | 27.1% |
| Run Total | 00:57 | 44:52 to 43:55 | 25.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:13 | 04:36 to 04:23 | 5.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:01 | 05:30 to 05:29 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:57 to 04:57 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:47 to 03:47 | 0.0% |
| Sauvage Léa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:58 | 00:00 | 05:01 -01:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:57 | 03:58 | 05:03 -00:06 | 05:01 -01:03 |
| Running 2 | 05:09 | 08:55 | 05:21 -00:12 | 10:04 -01:09 |
| Sled Push | 03:28 | 14:04 | 02:40 +00:48 | 15:25 -01:21 |
| Running 3 | 05:43 | 17:32 | 05:37 +00:06 | 18:05 -00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 06:41 | 23:15 | 05:34 +01:07 | 23:42 -00:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:53 | 29:56 | 05:40 +00:13 | 29:16 +00:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:30 | 35:49 | 05:49 -00:19 | 34:56 +00:53 |
| Running 5 | 06:15 | 41:19 | 05:48 +00:27 | 40:45 +00:34 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 47:34 | 05:18 -00:30 | 46:33 +01:01 |
| Running 6 | 05:51 | 52:22 | 05:42 +00:09 | 51:51 +00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 58:13 | 02:11 -00:13 | 57:33 +00:40 |
| Running 7 | 05:41 | 01:00:11 | 05:40 +00:01 | 59:44 +00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:36 | 01:05:52 | 04:36 +00:00 | 01:05:24 +00:28 |
| Running 8 | 06:22 | 01:10:28 | 06:03 +00:19 | 01:10:00 +00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 03:47 | 01:16:50 | 04:45 -00:58 | 01:16:03 +00:47 |
| Roxzone | 06:47 | 01:27:24 | 06:36 +00:11 | 01:27:24 |
Léa Sauvage demonstrated excellent running skills, as evidenced by her total running time being significantly faster than average. This indicates that she has a strong runner profile. However, there are areas where she could improve, particularly in segments such as the Sled Pull, Running 5, Sled Push, Running 4, and Running 6, where she lost the most time.
Overall, Léa Sauvage had a strong performance in the HYROX race, with a focus on her running skills. By targeting her weaker segments and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, she can further improve her performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Heiser Breanna | 2019 New York | 01:27:41 | |
| Vidal Pariente Beatriz | 2023 Bilbao | 01:27:16 | |
| Lee Lucy | 2024 Paris | 01:27:06 | |
| Collis Penny | 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:32 | |
| Tessaro Jenny | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:27:01 | |
| Patterson Morgan | 2024 New York | 01:27:14 | |
| Ott Elena | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:26:57 | |
| Kolbe Marisa | 2024 Hamburg | 01:26:56 | |
| Lacey Sarah | 2023 Birmingham | 01:27:46 | |
| Van Moorleghem Margaux | 2024 Marseille | 01:27:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
