Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire New Ellie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights New Ellie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the New Ellie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve New Ellie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:50 | 45:23 to 43:33 | 49.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:33 | 04:42 to 04:09 | 14.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 | 02:49 to 02:25 | 10.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:21 | 05:25 to 05:04 | 9.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 05:10 to 04:56 | 6.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:12 to 02:02 | 4.5% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 05:16 to 05:11 | 2.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 04:24 to 04:20 | 1.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| New Ellie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:16 | 00:00 | 05:00 +00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:10 | 05:16 | 05:02 +00:08 | 05:00 +00:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 10:26 | 05:19 +00:01 | 10:02 +00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:49 | 15:46 | 02:37 +00:12 | 15:21 +00:25 |
| Running 3 | 05:26 | 18:35 | 05:36 -00:10 | 17:58 +00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 05:25 | 24:01 | 05:29 -00:04 | 23:34 +00:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:42 | 29:26 | 05:38 +00:04 | 29:03 +00:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:27 | 35:08 | 05:44 -01:17 | 34:41 +00:27 |
| Running 5 | 05:42 | 39:35 | 05:46 -00:04 | 40:25 -00:50 |
| Rowing | 05:16 | 45:17 | 05:18 -00:02 | 46:11 -00:54 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 50:33 | 05:40 +00:16 | 51:29 -00:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 56:29 | 02:11 +00:01 | 57:09 -00:40 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 58:41 | 05:38 +00:04 | 59:20 -00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:24 | 01:04:23 | 04:33 -00:09 | 01:04:58 -00:35 |
| Running 8 | 06:23 | 01:08:47 | 06:00 +00:23 | 01:09:31 -00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 04:42 | 01:15:10 | 04:43 -00:01 | 01:15:31 -00:21 |
| Roxzone | 07:02 | 01:26:45 | 06:31 +00:31 | 01:26:45 |
Ellie's total running time of 00:45:23, while slightly slower than average by 02:11, indicates that she has a solid running foundation. To further enhance her performance, she should focus on improving her overall fitness and transition time in the roxzone.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested training techniques and exercises, Ellie can further enhance her performance in future HYROX races. It is crucial for her to maintain consistency in training, gradually increasing the intensity and volume to continue improving. With dedication and targeted training, Ellie has the potential to achieve even greater success in her future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rivera Piceno Jessica | 2024 Anaheim | 01:26:32 | |
| Krause Annika | 2024 Hamburg | 01:26:57 | |
| Drescher Lisa | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:39 | |
| Wilkinson Megan | 2024 Paris | 01:26:57 | |
| Winmill Louise | 2024 London | 01:26:27 | |
| Coe Harper | 2022 Manchester | 01:26:52 | |
| Johnson Nikki | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:27:07 | |
| Jansen Lieke | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:26:55 | |
| Ott Elena | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:26:57 | |
| Montgomery Lynsey | 2023 London | 01:26:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dubai | 01:12:56 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:25:40 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:33:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
