Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 294 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Malcolm Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Malcolm Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Malcolm Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Malcolm Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 13:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 04:57 | 12:07 to 07:10 | 37.0% |
| Wall Balls | 04:37 | 14:41 to 10:04 | 34.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:33 | 10:48 to 08:15 | 19.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:36 | 04:49 to 04:13 | 4.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 03:23 to 03:04 | 2.4% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 05:44 to 05:31 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 05:07 to 04:59 | 1.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 07:14 to 07:14 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 48:10 to 48:10 | 0.0% |
| Malcolm Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:09 | 00:00 | 05:50 -00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:07 | 05:09 | 04:58 +00:09 | 05:50 -00:41 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 10:16 | 06:29 -01:22 | 10:48 -00:32 |
| Sled Push | 04:49 | 15:23 | 04:20 +00:29 | 17:17 -01:54 |
| Running 3 | 06:07 | 20:12 | 07:27 -01:20 | 21:37 -01:25 |
| Sled Pull | 12:07 | 26:19 | 07:14 +04:53 | 29:04 -02:45 |
| Running 4 | 06:23 | 38:26 | 07:25 -01:02 | 36:18 +02:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:48 | 44:49 | 08:49 +01:59 | 43:43 +01:06 |
| Running 5 | 06:15 | 55:37 | 07:51 -01:36 | 52:32 +03:05 |
| Rowing | 05:44 | 01:01:52 | 05:37 +00:07 | 01:00:23 +01:29 |
| Running 6 | 06:21 | 01:07:36 | 07:27 -01:06 | 01:06:00 +01:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:23 | 01:13:57 | 02:59 +00:24 | 01:13:27 +00:30 |
| Running 7 | 05:54 | 01:17:20 | 07:30 -01:36 | 01:16:26 +00:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:14 | 01:23:14 | 08:23 -01:09 | 01:23:56 -00:42 |
| Running 8 | 06:58 | 01:30:28 | 09:50 -02:52 | 01:32:19 -01:51 |
| Wall Balls | 14:41 | 01:37:26 | 10:47 +03:54 | 01:42:09 -04:43 |
| Roxzone | 12:15 | 02:04:15 | 11:19 +00:56 | 02:04:15 |
Andrew Malcolm showcased a strong performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event, with an overall ranking in the top 64% of the 4107 athletes participating. In his age group 30-34, his rank was in the top 67% out of 813 athletes.
Notably, Andrew's total running time was 00:48:10, which is significantly faster than the average by 11:57. This indicates that Andrew has a strong runner profile. However, his overall time was 02:04:15, suggesting that although his running skills are impressive, his strength and endurance during the exercise zones could be improved.
Andrew should consider starting the race at a controlled pace to conserve energy for the strength-based segments where he currently struggles. A better pacing strategy and ensuring he is not starting too fast could help improve his overall time.
Given his strength in running, Andrew should leverage this to his advantage. Focusing on maintaining a steady pace during the running segments could allow him to gain time. However, he should also work on his recovery time post strength segments to ensure his running performance is not compromised.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Koper Kees | 2022 Amsterdam | 02:04:20 | |
| Schilling Mike | 2023 Hamburg | 02:03:52 | |
| 国 向文 | 2024 Beijing | 02:03:52 | |
| Arnold Christian | 2023 Paris | 02:04:44 | |
| Kästel Stephan | 2022 Frankfurt | 02:04:37 | |
| Nagel Sven | 2018 Essen | 02:03:57 | |
| Sen Gupta Mike | 2019 Hamburg | 02:03:53 | |
| Schäfer Marco | 2024 Frankfurt | 02:04:14 | |
| Wilkins Michael | 2024 Madrid | 02:04:04 | |
| Patel Mitesh | 2022 Birmingham | 02:03:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:41:53 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
