Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Macdonald Ella's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Macdonald Ella's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Macdonald Ella's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Macdonald Ella's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:06 | 56:06 to 48:00 | 97.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:28 to 02:17 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:36 to 01:36 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:19 to 06:19 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Macdonald Ella | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:46 | 00:00 | 05:25 +02:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:51 | 07:46 | 05:14 -00:23 | 05:25 +02:21 |
| Running 2 | 06:29 | 12:37 | 05:46 +00:43 | 10:39 +01:58 |
| Sled Push | 01:36 | 19:06 | 02:56 -01:20 | 16:25 +02:41 |
| Running 3 | 06:49 | 20:42 | 06:05 +00:44 | 19:21 +01:21 |
| Sled Pull | 03:58 | 27:31 | 06:14 -02:16 | 25:26 +02:05 |
| Running 4 | 06:47 | 31:29 | 06:06 +00:41 | 31:40 -00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:19 | 38:16 | 06:54 -00:35 | 37:46 +00:30 |
| Running 5 | 06:49 | 44:35 | 06:16 +00:33 | 44:40 -00:05 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 51:24 | 05:32 -00:33 | 50:56 +00:28 |
| Running 6 | 06:55 | 56:23 | 06:10 +00:45 | 56:28 -00:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 01:03:18 | 02:25 +00:03 | 01:02:38 +00:40 |
| Running 7 | 06:57 | 01:05:46 | 06:09 +00:48 | 01:05:03 +00:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:52 | 01:12:43 | 05:15 -00:23 | 01:11:12 +01:31 |
| Running 8 | 07:37 | 01:17:35 | 06:41 +00:56 | 01:16:27 +01:08 |
| Wall Balls | 04:32 | 01:25:12 | 05:32 -01:00 | 01:23:08 +02:04 |
| Roxzone | 06:42 | 01:36:19 | 07:39 -00:57 | 01:36:19 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Ella's running performance was the area where she lost the most time. Her total running time of 00:56:06 was 08:45 slower than the average, and several running segments, including Running 1, Running 2, Running 6, Running 7, Running 8, Running 3, Running 4, and Running 5, contributed to the time lost.
In conclusion, Ella Macdonald showed great determination and achieved a commendable performance in the 2023 Manchester Hyrox race. By focusing on improving her running performance, incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, and implementing effective race strategies, Ella can further enhance her performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hong Chris | 2024 Singapore | 01:35:57 | |
| King Lauren | 2024 Brisbane | 01:36:28 | |
| Skidmore Jodie | 2024 Malaga | 01:36:03 | |
| Smith Kate | 2023 London | 01:36:20 | |
| Balfe Rebecca | 2024 Köln | 01:36:32 | |
| Perry Hannah | 2023 Stockholm | 01:36:43 | |
| Walsh Breda | 2024 Dublin | 01:36:38 | |
| Babula Haley | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:36:28 | |
| Van Eijden Laura | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:35:56 | |
| Dunlop Zoe | 2024 Dublin | 01:36:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
