Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rigby Stephen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rigby Stephen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rigby Stephen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rigby Stephen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:50 | 10:45 to 07:55 | 68.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:41 | 04:06 to 03:25 | 16.5% |
| Run Total | 00:38 | 48:54 to 48:16 | 15.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:46 to 05:46 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:53 to 05:53 | 0.0% |
| Rigby Stephen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:31 | 00:00 | 05:07 +00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:39 | 05:31 | 04:39 +00:00 | 05:07 +00:24 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 10:10 | 05:38 -00:18 | 09:46 +00:24 |
| Sled Push | 04:06 | 15:30 | 03:26 +00:40 | 15:24 +00:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:52 | 19:36 | 06:09 -00:17 | 18:50 +00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 05:46 | 25:28 | 05:56 -00:10 | 24:59 +00:29 |
| Running 4 | 05:56 | 31:14 | 06:11 -00:15 | 30:55 +00:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:43 | 37:10 | 06:40 -01:57 | 37:06 +00:04 |
| Running 5 | 06:08 | 41:53 | 06:27 -00:19 | 43:46 -01:53 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 48:01 | 05:09 -00:06 | 50:13 -02:12 |
| Running 6 | 06:09 | 53:04 | 06:15 -00:06 | 55:22 -02:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 59:13 | 02:33 -00:05 | 01:01:37 -02:24 |
| Running 7 | 06:33 | 01:01:41 | 06:14 +00:19 | 01:04:10 -02:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:53 | 01:08:14 | 06:18 -00:25 | 01:10:24 -02:10 |
| Running 8 | 07:28 | 01:14:07 | 07:19 +00:09 | 01:16:42 -02:35 |
| Wall Balls | 10:45 | 01:21:35 | 08:12 +02:33 | 01:24:01 -02:26 |
| Roxzone | 08:48 | 01:40:59 | 08:46 +00:02 | 01:40:59 |
Based on the splits analysis, Stephen performed well in some segments, such as Ski Erg, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, Rowing, Farmers Carry, and Sandbag Lunges, where he was faster than the average time. However, he struggled in segments like Running 1, Sled Push, Running 7, Wall Balls, and Roxzone, where he lost valuable time compared to the average. It is important to note that his total running time was slower than average, indicating that he may need to focus on improving his running performance.
In conclusion, Stephen Rigby had a solid performance in the HYROX race in Birmingham. To improve his performance, he should focus on improving his running speed and endurance, as well as addressing the specific segments where he lost the most time. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and mental preparation, Stephen can enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fox Robert | 2022 London | 01:40:40 | |
| Zani Matteo | 2024 Rimini | 01:41:26 | |
| Rios Daviel | 2021 Dallas | 01:40:56 | |
| Pflugradt Luca | 2019 Hannover | 01:41:28 | |
| Centorani Stephen | 2024 New York | 01:40:59 | |
| Pickup Jack | 2024 Birmingham | 01:40:30 | |
| Russell Mark | 2022 Birmingham | 01:40:31 | |
| Palin Robert | 2023 Dublin | 01:41:03 | |
| Benjamin Seignez | 2024 Madrid | 01:40:44 | |
| Matos Joel | 2024 Malaga | 01:40:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:39:50 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
