Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Eijgenraam Mitchel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Eijgenraam Mitchel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Eijgenraam Mitchel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Eijgenraam Mitchel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:12 | 47:01 to 41:49 | 66.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:52 | 06:54 to 05:02 | 23.9% |
| Rowing | 00:37 | 05:21 to 04:44 | 7.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:10 to 02:03 | 1.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:56 to 03:56 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Eijgenraam Mitchel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:40 | 00:00 | 04:38 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:03 | 03:40 | 04:27 -00:24 | 04:38 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 05:25 | 07:43 | 04:59 +00:26 | 09:05 -01:22 |
| Sled Push | 01:45 | 13:08 | 02:55 -01:10 | 14:04 -00:56 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 14:53 | 05:25 +00:12 | 16:59 -02:06 |
| Sled Pull | 03:56 | 20:30 | 04:59 -01:03 | 22:24 -01:54 |
| Running 4 | 05:51 | 24:26 | 05:24 +00:27 | 27:23 -02:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:54 | 30:17 | 05:20 +01:34 | 32:47 -02:30 |
| Running 5 | 07:03 | 37:11 | 05:34 +01:29 | 38:07 -00:56 |
| Rowing | 05:21 | 44:14 | 04:49 +00:32 | 43:41 +00:33 |
| Running 6 | 06:06 | 49:35 | 05:26 +00:40 | 48:30 +01:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 55:41 | 02:11 -00:01 | 53:56 +01:45 |
| Running 7 | 05:57 | 57:51 | 05:24 +00:33 | 56:07 +01:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:59 | 01:03:48 | 05:06 -01:07 | 01:01:31 +02:17 |
| Running 8 | 07:26 | 01:07:47 | 06:02 +01:24 | 01:06:37 +01:10 |
| Wall Balls | 04:43 | 01:15:13 | 06:33 -01:50 | 01:12:39 +02:34 |
| Roxzone | 06:21 | 01:26:08 | 06:56 -00:35 | 01:26:08 |
Mitchel Eijgenraam showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank within the top 35% of participants. His strengths are evident in his speed and efficiency with strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls, where he performed significantly faster than average. However, his total running time was 03:40 slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in running, especially post-exercise scenarios. The initial running segments suggest Mitchel started his race too fast, as seen in Running 1, where he was significantly faster than average. His profile leans toward strength, given his exceptional performance in strength exercises, but there is room to enhance his running to achieve a more balanced hybrid athlete profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nopper Oliver | 2024 Berlin | 01:26:15 | |
| Preuß Lucas | 2023 Hamburg | 01:25:51 | |
| Schuurmann Dominik | 2024 Köln | 01:25:43 | |
| Duits Ronald | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:26:30 | |
| Kreutzer Manuel | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:26:22 | |
| Milevski Daniel | 2024 Melbourne | 01:26:17 | |
| Router Sam | 2024 London | 01:26:13 | |
| L Yoshua | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:26:17 | |
| Schilder Rene | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:26:08 | |
| Treml Felix | 2018 Hamburg | 01:26:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
