Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Stoekenbroek Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Stoekenbroek Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Stoekenbroek Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stoekenbroek Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:57 | 08:07 to 06:10 | 40.3% |
| Run Total | 01:52 | 48:23 to 46:31 | 38.6% |
| Rowing | 00:27 | 05:28 to 05:01 | 9.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 | 05:00 to 04:37 | 7.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:11 | 05:42 to 05:31 | 3.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:25 to 01:25 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:12 to 06:12 | 0.0% |
| Stoekenbroek Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:01 | 00:00 | 04:59 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 04:01 | 04:37 +00:23 | 04:59 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 05:28 | 09:01 | 05:26 +00:02 | 09:36 -00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:20 | 14:29 | 03:17 -00:57 | 15:02 -00:33 |
| Running 3 | 05:59 | 16:49 | 05:59 +00:00 | 18:19 -01:30 |
| Sled Pull | 05:42 | 22:48 | 05:40 +00:02 | 24:18 -01:30 |
| Running 4 | 06:19 | 28:30 | 05:56 +00:23 | 29:58 -01:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:07 | 34:49 | 06:23 +01:44 | 35:54 -01:05 |
| Running 5 | 06:43 | 42:56 | 06:11 +00:32 | 42:17 +00:39 |
| Rowing | 05:28 | 49:39 | 05:04 +00:24 | 48:28 +01:11 |
| Running 6 | 06:18 | 55:07 | 06:00 +00:18 | 53:32 +01:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:25 | 01:01:25 | 02:26 -01:01 | 59:32 +01:53 |
| Running 7 | 06:13 | 01:02:50 | 05:59 +00:14 | 01:01:58 +00:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:54 | 01:09:03 | 05:56 -01:02 | 01:07:57 +01:06 |
| Running 8 | 07:26 | 01:13:57 | 06:54 +00:32 | 01:13:53 +00:04 |
| Wall Balls | 06:12 | 01:21:23 | 07:44 -01:32 | 01:20:47 +00:36 |
| Roxzone | 09:19 | 01:36:47 | 08:16 +01:03 | 01:36:47 |
Nick Stoekenbroek delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank of 1663, placing him in the top 53% of all athletes. Within his age group (35-39), he ranked 305, which is in the top 54%. His total running time of 00:48:23 was slightly slower than the average by 00:34, indicating that while he has a solid running foundation, there's room for improvement in pacing and efficiency.
Nick's race began with a strong start, as evidenced by his excellent performance in Running 1, coming in 00:55 faster than the average. However, as the race progressed, his running times gradually lagged, suggesting he might have started too fast and subsequently fatigued. His strength segments, particularly the Sled Push, Farmers Carry, and Wall Balls, were exceptional, showcasing a hybrid profile with a slight edge towards strength activities. However, his overall running time suggests a need to balance his running and strength capacities more effectively.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pleus Christian | 2021 Hamburg | 01:37:00 | |
| Rossi Emanuele | 2024 Turin | 01:36:54 | |
| Bachmann Björn | 2024 Maastricht | 01:37:17 | |
| Rohrmoser Jens | 2019 Hannover | 01:36:58 | |
| Hackfurt Alexander | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:37:10 | |
| Hovi Saul | 2024 Milan | 01:36:33 | |
| Mayer Florian | 2022 München | 01:36:40 | |
| Jones Simon | 2024 Berlin | 01:36:36 | |
| Hernandez Carlos | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:36:57 | |
| Andresen Till | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:37:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
