Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:17 (From 07:42 to 05:25) | 42.9% |
| BBJ | 01:27 (From 05:52 to 04:25) | 27.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:34 (From 04:56 to 04:22) | 10.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 (From 02:13 to 01:52) | 6.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 (From 04:34 to 04:15) | 6.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:16 (From 04:28 to 04:12) | 5.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 (From 02:31 to 02:26) | 1.6% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:12 to 04:12) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 37:06 to 37:06) | 0.0% |
| Mack Brian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:31 | 00:00 | 04:23 -00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 03:31 | 04:21 +00:13 | 04:23 -00:52 |
| Running 2 | 04:32 | 08:05 | 04:42 -00:10 | 08:44 -00:39 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 12:37 | 02:43 -00:12 | 13:26 -00:49 |
| Running 3 | 04:44 | 15:08 | 05:05 -00:21 | 16:09 -01:01 |
| Sled Pull | 04:28 | 19:52 | 04:33 -00:05 | 21:14 -01:22 |
| Running 4 | 04:50 | 24:20 | 05:04 -00:14 | 25:47 -01:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:52 | 29:10 | 04:49 +01:03 | 30:51 -01:41 |
| Running 5 | 04:54 | 35:02 | 05:13 -00:19 | 35:40 -00:38 |
| Rowing | 04:12 | 39:56 | 04:40 -00:28 | 40:53 -00:57 |
| Running 6 | 04:51 | 44:08 | 05:05 -00:14 | 45:33 -01:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 48:59 | 02:02 +00:11 | 50:38 -01:39 |
| Running 7 | 04:54 | 51:12 | 05:04 -00:10 | 52:40 -01:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:56 | 56:06 | 04:41 +00:15 | 57:44 -01:38 |
| Running 8 | 04:54 | 01:01:02 | 05:33 -00:39 | 01:02:25 -01:23 |
| Wall Balls | 07:42 | 01:05:56 | 05:54 +01:48 | 01:07:58 -02:02 |
| Roxzone | 06:32 | 01:20:01 | 06:09 +00:23 | 01:20:01 |
Brian Mack showcased a solid performance at the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event, finishing in the top 16% of all 1404 athletes and ranking 21 in his age group. His overall time was impressive at 01:20:01. Brian's strength lay in his running, with a total running time of 00:37:06, which was 03:16 faster than the average. His best running lap was timed at 00:04:32. Based on these statistics, Brian has a strong runner profile.
His pacing throughout the race was impressive, he started strong and maintained a steady pace. However, he did lose some time in the roxzone, spending 00:06:32, which was 00:31 slower than average, indicating that he rested more or took more time for transition. This suggests that Brian's overall fitness and transition time could use some improvement.
For better performance in future races, Brian should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Franz Mario | 2022 Bremen | 01:20:15 | |
| Scott John | 2023 Manchester | 01:20:31 | |
| Wwelch Chris | 2024 Toronto | 01:19:43 | |
| Höglauer Markus | 2023 München | 01:20:10 | |
| Mobach Tjebbe | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:29 | |
| Freeman Daniel | 2023 Melbourne | 01:19:42 | |
| Synowka Lech | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:20:06 | |
| Ferguson Joseph | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:35 | |
| Li Pak Ho | 2024 Taipei | 01:20:03 | |
| Garcia Domingo | 2021 London | 01:20:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Chicago Mack Brian | 01:44:09 | |
| 2023 Chicago Mack Brian | 01:24:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Mack Brian
