Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kooij Rick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kooij Rick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kooij Rick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kooij Rick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:32 | 08:33 to 06:01 | 52.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:55 | 05:43 to 04:48 | 19.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:50 | 05:48 to 04:58 | 17.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 | 04:41 to 04:22 | 6.6% |
| Run Total | 00:11 | 41:40 to 41:29 | 3.8% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:46 to 04:43 | 1.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:52 to 01:52 | 0.0% |
| Kooij Rick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:46 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 03:46 | 04:27 +00:14 | 04:35 -00:49 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 08:27 | 04:57 +00:13 | 09:02 -00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:21 | 13:37 | 02:55 -00:34 | 13:59 -00:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:30 | 15:58 | 05:23 +00:07 | 16:54 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 04:22 | 21:28 | 04:57 -00:35 | 22:17 -00:49 |
| Running 4 | 05:17 | 25:50 | 05:21 -00:04 | 27:14 -01:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:48 | 31:07 | 05:19 +00:29 | 32:35 -01:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 36:55 | 05:32 +00:09 | 37:54 -00:59 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 42:36 | 04:49 -00:03 | 43:26 -00:50 |
| Running 6 | 05:11 | 47:22 | 05:23 -00:12 | 48:15 -00:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 52:33 | 02:12 -00:20 | 53:38 -01:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:09 | 54:25 | 05:22 -00:13 | 55:50 -01:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:43 | 59:34 | 05:06 +00:37 | 01:01:12 -01:38 |
| Running 8 | 05:59 | 01:05:17 | 05:59 +00:00 | 01:06:18 -01:01 |
| Wall Balls | 08:33 | 01:11:16 | 06:30 +02:03 | 01:12:17 -01:01 |
| Roxzone | 05:56 | 01:25:38 | 06:51 -00:55 | 01:25:38 |
Rick Kooij delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX race, ranking 1078th overall and 200th in his age group, which places him in the top 36% of his category. His total running time was notably strong, being 1:22 faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. His best running lap was a swift 00:05:09, showcasing his proficiency in pacing and endurance. However, the performance across the running segments suggests that Rick may have started the race too fast, with Running 1 being significantly faster than average. This pattern could have impacted his endurance in subsequent segments, particularly in strength exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mcmorrow William | 2023 London | 01:25:24 | |
| Bridgett Chris | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:35 | |
| Torreño Alfonso | 2024 Madrid | 01:25:58 | |
| Szalay Christian | 2022 Wien | 01:25:52 | |
| Westwood Chris | 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:30 | |
| Maidment Pierre | 2023 Hamburg | 01:25:22 | |
| Hendriks Bram | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:25:52 | |
| Walker Ross | 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:36 | |
| Angevin Cedric | 2024 Madrid | 01:25:21 | |
| Hoffmann Jannik | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:25:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
