Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bridgett Chris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bridgett Chris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bridgett Chris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bridgett Chris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:45 | 06:33 to 04:48 | 35.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:08 | 05:44 to 04:36 | 23.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:05 | 06:03 to 04:58 | 22.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:30 | 06:31 to 06:01 | 10.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 02:24 to 02:02 | 7.5% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:47 to 04:43 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:22 to 39:22 | 0.0% |
| Bridgett Chris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:27 | 00:00 | 04:36 -00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 04:27 | 04:27 -00:11 | 04:36 -00:09 |
| Running 2 | 04:47 | 08:43 | 04:57 -00:10 | 09:03 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:01 | 13:30 | 02:54 -00:53 | 14:00 -00:30 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 15:31 | 05:23 -00:25 | 16:54 -01:23 |
| Sled Pull | 05:44 | 20:29 | 04:57 +00:47 | 22:17 -01:48 |
| Running 4 | 04:59 | 26:13 | 05:21 -00:22 | 27:14 -01:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:03 | 31:12 | 05:18 +00:45 | 32:35 -01:23 |
| Running 5 | 04:54 | 37:15 | 05:31 -00:37 | 37:53 -00:38 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 42:09 | 04:49 -00:02 | 43:24 -01:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:04 | 46:56 | 05:23 -00:19 | 48:13 -01:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 52:00 | 02:12 +00:12 | 53:36 -01:36 |
| Running 7 | 04:54 | 54:24 | 05:22 -00:28 | 55:48 -01:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:33 | 59:18 | 05:06 +01:27 | 01:01:10 -01:52 |
| Running 8 | 05:23 | 01:05:51 | 05:59 -00:36 | 01:06:16 -00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 06:31 | 01:11:14 | 06:30 +00:01 | 01:12:15 -01:01 |
| Roxzone | 07:59 | 01:25:35 | 06:50 +01:09 | 01:25:35 |
Chris Bridgett delivered a strong performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, ranking in the top 30% overall and the top 34% in his age group. Notably, his total running time was 3 minutes and 36 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong runner's profile. His consistent performance across the running segments, with times significantly faster than average, further confirms his running strength. However, some strength-based exercises like the Sandbag Lunges and Burpees Broad Jump highlighted areas where improvement is needed. Chris maintained a steady pace through the initial running segments, suggesting he did not start too fast or too slow, but rather with a balanced and calculated approach.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Reckemeier Kai | 2024 Hamburg | 01:25:45 | |
| Renwick Tom | 2023 Dubai | 01:25:13 | |
| Barnett Tom | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:39 | |
| Francis Shane | 2024 Dublin | 01:25:47 | |
| Lane Colin | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:25:05 | |
| Przybylak Zbigniew | 2024 Gdansk | 01:25:55 | |
| Giancristofaro Paolo | 2024 Rimini | 01:25:58 | |
| Depee Anderson | 2021 Dallas | 01:25:14 | |
| Vonhasselt Thomas | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:25:41 | |
| Willis Mark | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:35:45 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
