Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
852 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 852 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 852 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 852 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
06:43.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 852 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Lars Herssevoort demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 64% overall and top 65% in his age group. The analysis of his pacing indicates that Lars started strong, with an impressive performance in the initial segments, particularly the Sled Push and Sled Pull, where he was significantly faster than average. However, his total running time was slower than average by 3:56, suggesting that Lars possesses a stronger profile in strength activities rather than running. This is further evidenced by his slower segments in the latter part of the race, indicating potential fatigue or a need for improved endurance.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time: Lars's running times, especially in segments 5, 6, and 7, were notably slower. To enhance his running performance, he should focus on building running endurance and speed. Training Strategies: Implement interval training and tempo runs to improve speed and stamina. Exercises like hill sprints and track repeats can boost speed endurance.
Burpees Broad Jump: Being 33 seconds slower than average suggests fatigue or a technique issue. Training Strategies: Improve explosive power and endurance with plyometric drills such as box jumps and burpee variations. Focus on maintaining a consistent pace and smooth transitions between movements.
Wall Balls: Although Lars was faster than average, there's room for improvement. Training Strategies: Enhance upper body and core strength with medicine ball throws and wall ball-specific drills. Work on maintaining a steady rhythm and breathing technique during high-rep sets.
Roxzone: Lars was faster than average, but optimizing transition times can yield better results. Training Strategies: Practice efficient transitions in training, focusing on quick recovery and mental readiness between zones. Implement drills that simulate race conditions to improve transition speed.
Race Strategies
Pacing: Lars should aim for a more consistent pace throughout the race. Starting strong is advantageous, but maintaining a steady pace can prevent fatigue in later segments.
Energy Management: Focus on conserving energy during strength segments to maintain higher performance during runs. Utilize strategic breathing techniques and efficient movement patterns to minimize energy expenditure.
Mental Focus: Develop mental resilience through visualization techniques and mindfulness practices to enhance focus and reduce perceived exertion during the race.