Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Denholm Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Denholm Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Denholm Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Denholm Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:40 | 10:04 to 07:24 | 58.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:09 | 07:19 to 06:10 | 25.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:19 | 06:04 to 05:45 | 6.9% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 05:15 to 05:01 | 5.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 05:41 to 05:31 | 3.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:27 to 02:24 | 1.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:02 to 03:02 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:45 to 44:45 | 0.0% |
| Denholm Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:44 | 00:00 | 05:00 +00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 05:44 | 04:38 -00:10 | 05:00 +00:44 |
| Running 2 | 05:04 | 10:12 | 05:27 -00:23 | 09:38 +00:34 |
| Sled Push | 03:02 | 15:16 | 03:18 -00:16 | 15:05 +00:11 |
| Running 3 | 05:16 | 18:18 | 05:58 -00:42 | 18:23 -00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 05:41 | 23:34 | 05:40 +00:01 | 24:21 -00:47 |
| Running 4 | 05:33 | 29:15 | 05:57 -00:24 | 30:01 -00:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:19 | 34:48 | 06:24 +00:55 | 35:58 -01:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:37 | 42:07 | 06:12 -00:35 | 42:22 -00:15 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 47:44 | 05:04 +00:11 | 48:34 -00:50 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 52:59 | 06:01 -00:17 | 53:38 -00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:27 | 58:43 | 02:27 +00:00 | 59:39 -00:56 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 01:01:10 | 06:01 -00:19 | 01:02:06 -00:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:04 | 01:06:52 | 05:59 +00:05 | 01:08:07 -01:15 |
| Running 8 | 06:09 | 01:12:56 | 06:58 -00:49 | 01:14:06 -01:10 |
| Wall Balls | 10:04 | 01:19:05 | 07:49 +02:15 | 01:21:04 -01:59 |
| Roxzone | 08:10 | 01:37:10 | 08:17 -00:07 | 01:37:10 |
Kevin Denholm demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race, particularly considering he competed in the highly competitive 40-44 age group. His overall rank of 2076 placed him in the top 50% of a total of 4107 athletes, showing his ability to hold his own in the competition. Remarkably, Kevin was able to achieve a total running time of 00:44:45, which was 03:05 faster than the average running time. This indicates that Kevin has a runner profile and excels in race segments that demand high cardiovascular fitness.
However, Kevin's performance in the roxzone segment was slightly slower than average, suggesting that transitions between exercises and recovery times could be improved. His performance in the first running segment was slower compared to the average, which might suggest a slower start to the race. As the race progressed, Kevin was able to improve his running times, indicating a strong endurance base.
To optimize race performance, Kevin should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Möhring Norbert | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:37:12 | |
| Bellow Charles | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:36:55 | |
| Mesmer Roman | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:37:37 | |
| Blüthgen Maximilian | 2020 Hannover | 01:37:16 | |
| Persson Oskar | 2023 Malmö | 01:37:07 | |
| Hammer Marc | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:36:49 | |
| Moore Peter | 2024 Glasgow | 01:36:44 | |
| Hotman Achab | 2023 Barcelona | 01:37:35 | |
| Pérez De La Rosa Kevin | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:36:52 | |
| Walter Matthias | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:36:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
