Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Venema Rogier's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Venema Rogier's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Venema Rogier's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Venema Rogier's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:45 | 52:01 to 48:16 | 61.8% |
| Sled Pull | 01:06 | 06:56 to 05:50 | 18.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:41 | 07:15 to 06:34 | 11.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:26 | 03:51 to 03:25 | 7.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:38 to 02:32 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:38 to 06:38 | 0.0% |
| Venema Rogier | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:55 | 00:00 | 05:08 -01:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 03:55 | 04:39 -00:04 | 05:08 -01:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:58 | 08:30 | 05:41 +00:17 | 09:47 -01:17 |
| Sled Push | 03:51 | 14:28 | 03:27 +00:24 | 15:28 -01:00 |
| Running 3 | 07:13 | 18:19 | 06:12 +01:01 | 18:55 -00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 06:56 | 25:32 | 05:53 +01:03 | 25:07 +00:25 |
| Running 4 | 06:45 | 32:28 | 06:14 +00:31 | 31:00 +01:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:15 | 39:13 | 06:42 +00:33 | 37:14 +01:59 |
| Running 5 | 06:43 | 46:28 | 06:28 +00:15 | 43:56 +02:32 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 53:11 | 05:09 -00:11 | 50:24 +02:47 |
| Running 6 | 06:53 | 58:09 | 06:16 +00:37 | 55:33 +02:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:38 | 01:05:02 | 02:32 +00:06 | 01:01:49 +03:13 |
| Running 7 | 06:48 | 01:07:40 | 06:16 +00:32 | 01:04:21 +03:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:27 | 01:14:28 | 06:18 -00:51 | 01:10:37 +03:51 |
| Running 8 | 07:49 | 01:19:55 | 07:22 +00:27 | 01:16:55 +03:00 |
| Wall Balls | 06:38 | 01:27:44 | 08:09 -01:31 | 01:24:17 +03:27 |
| Roxzone | 07:02 | 01:41:15 | 08:49 -01:47 | 01:41:15 |
One notable aspect of his performance is his running ability, as evidenced by his total running time of 00:52:01. While this is 04:52 slower than the average, it suggests that Venema has a solid foundation in running. However, he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to reduce the time spent in the roxzone.
In conclusion, Rogier Venema had a solid performance in the HYROX race in Amsterdam. To enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his endurance, upper body strength, lower body strength, speed, and agility. Implementing specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and form corrections, will help him improve his performance in the identified areas. Additionally, optimizing his pacing, reducing transition time, and mentally preparing himself for the race will contribute to overall improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Butti Fabrizio | 2023 Rimini | 01:41:36 | |
| Timmermans Jeroen | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:40:55 | |
| Cevallos Barreiro Marcial | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:41:33 | |
| Newton Dave | 2024 Manchester | 01:41:23 | |
| Bramble Michael | 2024 Sydney | 01:41:37 | |
| Gilmore Andrew | 2024 Madrid | 01:41:02 | |
| Rivera Manuel | 2024 New York | 01:41:19 | |
| Martinez Diego | 2024 Mexico City | 01:41:26 | |
| Erazo Olver | 2024 New York | 01:41:00 | |
| Olszewski Piotr | 2024 Katowice | 01:41:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:30:37 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
