Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 359 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Groningen Natasja's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Groningen Natasja's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Groningen Natasja's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Groningen Natasja's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 11:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 11:22 | 01:07:11 to 55:49 | 99.9% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 05:58 to 05:57 | 0.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:14 to 06:14 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:16 to 07:16 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Van Groningen Natasja | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:26 | 00:00 | 06:08 +01:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:27 | 07:26 | 05:33 -00:06 | 06:08 +01:18 |
| Running 2 | 09:29 | 12:53 | 06:42 +02:47 | 11:41 +01:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 22:22 | 03:33 -01:04 | 18:23 +03:59 |
| Running 3 | 07:51 | 24:51 | 07:05 +00:46 | 21:56 +02:55 |
| Sled Pull | 06:14 | 32:42 | 07:42 -01:28 | 29:01 +03:41 |
| Running 4 | 08:00 | 38:56 | 07:12 +00:48 | 36:43 +02:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:16 | 46:56 | 09:05 -01:49 | 43:55 +03:01 |
| Running 5 | 08:31 | 54:12 | 07:32 +00:59 | 53:00 +01:12 |
| Rowing | 05:58 | 01:02:43 | 05:57 +00:01 | 01:00:32 +02:11 |
| Running 6 | 08:03 | 01:08:41 | 07:21 +00:42 | 01:06:29 +02:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 01:16:44 | 02:50 -00:37 | 01:13:50 +02:54 |
| Running 7 | 08:38 | 01:18:57 | 07:21 +01:17 | 01:16:40 +02:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:46 | 01:27:35 | 06:41 -01:55 | 01:24:01 +03:34 |
| Running 8 | 09:17 | 01:32:21 | 08:19 +00:58 | 01:30:42 +01:39 |
| Wall Balls | 05:15 | 01:41:38 | 07:21 -02:06 | 01:39:01 +02:37 |
| Roxzone | 09:26 | 01:56:12 | 09:50 -00:24 | 01:56:12 |
Natasja Van Groningen delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 30% of overall participants. Her strength in functional exercises, particularly in the sled push, sled pull, and sandbag lunges, highlights her excellent conditioning in strength-based events. However, her total running time was 08:52 slower than the average, suggesting a need for improvement in running efficiency. The pattern across the first four running segments indicates that Natasja might have started too slowly compared to the average, potentially impacting her overall running performance. This profile suggests that while Natasja is strong in functional exercises, she would benefit from focusing on enhancing her running capabilities to improve her hybrid athlete profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Smith Francesca | 2021 London | 01:56:02 | |
| Thourain Léa | 2024 Paris | 01:56:02 | |
| Gokaldas Reshma | 2024 Anaheim | 01:56:31 | |
| Karlsson Emelie | 2024 Rimini | 01:56:12 | |
| Pedersen Stinne Ankjær | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:56:12 | |
| Valdés García Daniela | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:56:40 | |
| Wurzinger Victoria | 2023 Wien | 01:56:36 | |
| Malin Rebecca | 2024 Glasgow | 01:55:44 | |
| La Vista Naomi | 2023 Milan | 01:56:20 | |
| Jones Alicia | 2024 London | 01:56:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
