Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Den Heuvel Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Den Heuvel Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Den Heuvel Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Den Heuvel Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:17 | 48:45 to 44:28 | 74.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:38 | 05:09 to 04:31 | 11.0% |
| Rowing | 00:37 | 05:31 to 04:54 | 10.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:15 | 05:23 to 05:08 | 4.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:39 to 02:39 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Van Den Heuvel Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:37 | 00:00 | 04:49 -00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:09 | 04:37 | 04:33 +00:36 | 04:49 -00:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:14 | 09:46 | 05:19 -00:05 | 09:22 +00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 15:00 | 03:08 -00:29 | 14:41 +00:19 |
| Running 3 | 06:46 | 17:39 | 05:47 +00:59 | 17:49 -00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 05:23 | 24:25 | 05:23 +00:00 | 23:36 +00:49 |
| Running 4 | 06:18 | 29:48 | 05:46 +00:32 | 28:59 +00:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:35 | 36:06 | 05:59 -01:24 | 34:45 +01:21 |
| Running 5 | 06:32 | 40:41 | 05:58 +00:34 | 40:44 -00:03 |
| Rowing | 05:31 | 47:13 | 04:58 +00:33 | 46:42 +00:31 |
| Running 6 | 05:53 | 52:44 | 05:48 +00:05 | 51:40 +01:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 58:37 | 02:22 -00:08 | 57:28 +01:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:55 | 01:00:51 | 05:46 +00:09 | 59:50 +01:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:49 | 01:06:46 | 05:36 -00:47 | 01:05:36 +01:10 |
| Running 8 | 07:33 | 01:11:35 | 06:33 +01:00 | 01:11:12 +00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 05:32 | 01:19:08 | 07:14 -01:42 | 01:17:45 +01:23 |
| Roxzone | 08:08 | 01:32:40 | 07:41 +00:27 | 01:32:40 |
Tom's total running time of 00:48:45 was 04:37 slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap of 00:04:37 was faster than average, suggesting that he has a strong running profile. However, his overall running performance should be a focus for improvement.
In conclusion, Tom Van Den Heuvel performed well in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, transition time, and specific segments such as Running 3 and Running 8, Tom can become a stronger and more competitive athlete. Implementing the suggested training strategies, drills, and race strategies will help him achieve his goals and improve his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Delgado Rodrigo | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:32:44 | |
| Pereira Villajos Hugo | 2022 Madrid | 01:32:43 | |
| Weerden Leo | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:32:44 | |
| Merk Niklas | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:33:05 | |
| Woods Paul | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:31 | |
| Jasniak Thimo | 2020 Hannover | 01:32:16 | |
| Kuhlen David | 2024 Köln | 01:32:55 | |
| Michalak Lukasz | 2023 Warschau | 01:32:43 | |
| Garcia Aguilar Gerson | 2022 Valencia | 01:32:32 | |
| Rognetta Franco | 2024 Milan | 01:33:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:39:08 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:13 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
