Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Silsbury Scott's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Silsbury Scott's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Silsbury Scott's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Silsbury Scott's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:40 | 45:41 to 43:01 | 53.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:46 | 07:05 to 05:19 | 35.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:34 | 05:27 to 04:53 | 11.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:50 to 02:50 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:53 to 01:53 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Silsbury Scott | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:53 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 03:53 | 04:29 -00:02 | 04:45 -00:52 |
| Running 2 | 05:24 | 08:20 | 05:06 +00:18 | 09:14 -00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 13:44 | 03:00 -00:10 | 14:20 -00:36 |
| Running 3 | 05:58 | 16:34 | 05:33 +00:25 | 17:20 -00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 05:27 | 22:32 | 05:08 +00:19 | 22:53 -00:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:50 | 27:59 | 05:33 +00:17 | 28:01 -00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:05 | 33:49 | 05:38 +01:27 | 33:34 +00:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:59 | 40:54 | 05:44 +00:15 | 39:12 +01:42 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 46:53 | 04:53 -00:04 | 44:56 +01:57 |
| Running 6 | 05:57 | 51:42 | 05:35 +00:22 | 49:49 +01:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 57:39 | 02:16 -00:23 | 55:24 +02:15 |
| Running 7 | 06:05 | 59:32 | 05:34 +00:31 | 57:40 +01:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:02 | 01:05:37 | 05:23 -00:21 | 01:03:14 +02:23 |
| Running 8 | 06:39 | 01:10:39 | 06:14 +00:25 | 01:08:37 +02:02 |
| Wall Balls | 05:13 | 01:17:18 | 06:49 -01:36 | 01:14:51 +02:27 |
| Roxzone | 06:30 | 01:28:52 | 07:12 -00:42 | 01:28:52 |
Scott Silsbury delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race, finishing in the top 71% of all athletes and top 73% in his age group (35-39). His overall running time was slightly slower than average (01:24), indicating that his strength lies more with the strength-based exercises rather than running. Scott's performance in the first 4 running segments suggests that he started the race at a higher pace than the average competitor, which could have contributed to his slower running times in later segments. This suggests that pacing is an area that Scott can focus on for improvement.
Scott's key areas for improvement are the total running time, Burpees Broad Jump, Sled Pull, and the Roxzone transition times.
Implementing effective race strategies can significantly improve Scott's performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Canestrari Gian Luca | 2023 Rimini | 01:28:47 | |
| Lasslett Jake | 2023 Melbourne | 01:28:58 | |
| Roles Tom | 2024 London | 01:28:23 | |
| Kopp Christian | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:28:38 | |
| Simon Alvaro | 2022 Maastricht | 01:28:22 | |
| Mc Tigue Paul | 2024 Brisbane | 01:29:21 | |
| Wellington Dayron | 2024 New York | 01:28:36 | |
| Marrón Martínez Ruben | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:30 | |
| Jordan Matthew | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:28:41 | |
| Frandsen Christian | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:29:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
