Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 206 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kap Jim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kap Jim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kap Jim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kap Jim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:28 | 59:49 to 57:21 | 49.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:15 | 10:53 to 08:38 | 45.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 05:10 to 05:03 | 2.4% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 05:43 to 05:36 | 2.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:56 to 06:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 07:27 to 07:27 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 10:00 to 10:00 | 0.0% |
| Kap Jim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:46 | 00:00 | 05:50 +00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:10 | 06:46 | 04:59 +00:11 | 05:50 +00:56 |
| Running 2 | 07:00 | 11:56 | 06:52 +00:08 | 10:49 +01:07 |
| Sled Push | 04:16 | 18:56 | 04:07 +00:09 | 17:41 +01:15 |
| Running 3 | 07:21 | 23:12 | 07:43 -00:22 | 21:48 +01:24 |
| Sled Pull | 06:56 | 30:33 | 07:29 -00:33 | 29:31 +01:02 |
| Running 4 | 07:25 | 37:29 | 07:44 -00:19 | 37:00 +00:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:53 | 44:54 | 08:45 +02:08 | 44:44 +00:10 |
| Running 5 | 07:40 | 55:47 | 08:13 -00:33 | 53:29 +02:18 |
| Rowing | 05:43 | 01:03:27 | 05:42 +00:01 | 01:01:42 +01:45 |
| Running 6 | 07:11 | 01:09:10 | 07:56 -00:45 | 01:07:24 +01:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 01:16:21 | 02:59 -00:31 | 01:15:20 +01:01 |
| Running 7 | 07:15 | 01:18:49 | 07:56 -00:41 | 01:18:19 +00:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:27 | 01:26:04 | 08:30 -01:03 | 01:26:15 -00:11 |
| Running 8 | 09:15 | 01:33:31 | 10:46 -01:31 | 01:34:45 -01:14 |
| Wall Balls | 10:00 | 01:42:46 | 10:59 -00:59 | 01:45:31 -02:45 |
| Roxzone | 15:59 | 02:08:36 | 12:06 +03:53 | 02:08:36 |
Jim Kap performed well in the Hyrox race in London, finishing in the top 66% of all athletes and the top 64% in his age group (50-54). His overall time of 02:08:36 is commendable, but there are areas where he can make improvements to enhance his performance.
In terms of his profile, Jim's total running time of 00:59:49 suggests that he has a stronger running profile compared to the average finisher. However, it is important to note that his total running time was 04:44 slower than the average, indicating that he may need to focus on improving his running speed and efficiency.
In summary, Jim Kap has shown strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can make improvements. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and efficient transitions, he can enhance his overall performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas David | 2024 London | 02:09:03 | |
| Eaton Kenneth | 2024 Köln | 02:08:41 | |
| Luther Glenn | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 02:08:36 | |
| Klossek Kevin | 2024 Katowice | 02:09:00 | |
| Vasquez Gustavo | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 02:08:22 | |
| Wilson James | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:08:14 | |
| García David | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:08:46 | |
| Teh Javier | 2024 Singapore | 02:08:29 | |
| Henrich Heiko | 2023 Barcelona | 02:08:15 | |
| Higgins Lorcan | 2023 Dublin | 02:08:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
