Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 695 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:56 (From 08:11 to 06:15) | 60.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:47 (From 06:33 to 05:46) | 24.6% |
| BBJ | 00:28 (From 08:06 to 07:38) | 14.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:43 to 04:43) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:37 to 02:37) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 06:25 to 06:25) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 05:15 to 05:15) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:01 to 02:01) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 51:01 to 51:01) | 0.0% |
| Griffiths Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:08 | 00:00 | 05:42 +01:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 07:08 | 05:24 -00:41 | 05:42 +01:26 |
| Running 2 | 05:55 | 11:51 | 06:15 -00:20 | 11:06 +00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 17:46 | 03:10 -00:33 | 17:21 +00:25 |
| Running 3 | 06:16 | 20:23 | 06:38 -00:22 | 20:31 -00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 06:25 | 26:39 | 06:52 -00:27 | 27:09 -00:30 |
| Running 4 | 06:19 | 33:04 | 06:39 -00:20 | 34:01 -00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:06 | 39:23 | 07:53 +00:13 | 40:40 -01:17 |
| Running 5 | 06:17 | 47:29 | 06:52 -00:35 | 48:33 -01:04 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 53:46 | 05:47 -00:32 | 55:25 -01:39 |
| Running 6 | 06:19 | 59:01 | 06:45 -00:26 | 01:01:12 -02:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 01:05:20 | 02:34 -00:33 | 01:07:57 -02:37 |
| Running 7 | 06:09 | 01:07:21 | 06:44 -00:35 | 01:10:31 -03:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:33 | 01:13:30 | 05:51 +00:42 | 01:17:15 -03:45 |
| Running 8 | 06:42 | 01:20:03 | 07:28 -00:46 | 01:23:06 -03:03 |
| Wall Balls | 08:11 | 01:26:45 | 06:25 +01:46 | 01:30:34 -03:49 |
| Roxzone | 11:00 | 01:45:47 | 08:48 +02:12 | 01:45:47 |
Sarah Griffiths demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event, finishing in the top 25% of all competitors and top 17% in her age group. Her overall strength and running capabilities proved advantageous, as evidenced by her total running time being faster than average. This suggests that she possesses a predominantly runner profile. However, she may have started off a bit slower than the average, as seen in her first running segment. Despite that, she quickly made up for it in the subsequent segments, suggesting effective pacing and energy conservation.
Moving forward, Sarah could take the following strategies into consideration for her future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bonnard Kerstin | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:46:06 | |
| Cardwell Lisa | 2024 Dublin | 01:45:57 | |
| Maclean Chanelva | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:45:19 | |
| Jorgensen Maia | 2021 Chicago | 01:45:43 | |
| Taghizadeh Elika | 2023 Singapore | 01:45:55 | |
| Searle Nicole | 2024 London | 01:45:31 | |
| Berenger Emélie | 2024 Marseille | 01:45:59 | |
| Brown Trudy | 2023 Melbourne | 01:45:24 | |
| Van Elst Nele | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:45:35 | |
| Peh Zi Qi | 2024 Singapore | 01:45:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham Griffiths Sarah | 02:14:24 | |
| 2023 Birmingham Griffiths Sarah, Murphy Lisa | 01:30:47 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Griffiths Sarah
